Computational Analysis and Anti‐Hiv/Antifungal Studies of 2‐Aryl‐N1‐Arylacetamido Benzimidazole Derivatives

Tushar Ranjan Mohapatra,Swastika Ganguly,Kiattawee Choowngkomon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202401854
2024-08-25
ChemistrySelect
Abstract:In this study, 17 derivatives of 2‐aryl‐N1‐arylacetamido benzimidazoles 3(a–q) were synthesized and assessed for their in vitro anti‐HIV and antifungal activities. Among these derivatives, compounds 3 a, 3 b, 3 i, and 3 n exhibited moderate inhibition of HIV‐1 reverse transcriptase (RT), whereas other compounds showed minimal activity compared to efavirenz. Despite this, most compounds have demonstrated significant antifungal activity, particularly against Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger. Compounds 3 a, 3 f, 3 m, and 3 n were the most effective antifungal agents. Computational methods were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the newly developed inhibitors. Medicinal chemistry highly values the benzimidazole scaffold as a pharmacophore owing to its versatile range of biological functions. In the present study, 17 derivatives of 2‐aryl‐N1‐arylacetamido benzimidazoles 3(a–q) were synthesized by nucleophilic substitution reactions between different 2‐chloro‐N‐(aryl)‐acetamides 2(a–q) and 2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazole (1) in N, N‐dimethylformamide, and evaluated for in vitro anti‐HIV and antifungal activities. Of these derivatives, compounds 3 a, 3 b, 3 i, and 3 n showed moderate inhibitory efficacy against HIV‐1 RT, whereas the remaining compounds showed negligible activity compared to the standard drug efavirenz. In contrast, most of the test compounds demonstrated significant efficacy against fungal strains such as Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger. Compounds 3 a, 3 f, 3 m, and 3 n were the most effective antifungal agents. We applied computational approaches to rationalize the potency of the newly synthesized inhibitors.
chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?