Abstract:Purpose: This study aims to investigate the differences in binocular corneal parameters and their interrelation with binocular biometric parameters asymmetry in patients with simple myopic anisometropia, thereby elucidating the influence of myopia process on various corneal parameters. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 65 patients with anisometropia in monocular myopia were included. They were divided into low anisometropia group: 3.00D<Δ spherical equivalent (SE)≤−1.00D (Δ represents the difference between the two eyes, i.e., myopic data minus emmetropic data) and high anisometropia group: ΔSE ≤ −3.00D. Corneal and ocular biometric parameters were measured using Pentacam, Corvis ST, and IOL Master 700. Statistical analyses focused on the binocular corneal parameters asymmetry, using the contralateral emmetropia as a control. Results: The mean age of participants was 18.5 ± 1.3 years, with the average SE for myopia and emmetropia being −2.93 ± 1.09D and −0.16 ± 0.41D, respectively. The central corneal thickness (CCT), flat keratometry (Kf), keratometry astigmatism (Ka), total corneal aberration (6 mm) (TOA), surface variance index (ISV), vertical asymmetry index (IVA), stress-strain index (SSI), and first applanation stiffness parameter (SPA1) and ambrosia relational thickness-horizontal (ARTh) showed significant differences between anisometropic fellow eyes ( p < 0.05). There were significant differences in ΔIVA, Δ the difference between the mean refractive power of the inferior and superior corneas (I-S), Δ deviation value of Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display (BAD-D), Δ deformation amplitude ratio max (2 mm) (DAR)and Δ tomographic biomechanical index (TBI) ( p < 0.05) in two groups. Asymmetry of corneal parameters was correlated with asymmetry of ocular biometric parameters. Anisometropia (ΔSE) was positively correlated with ΔIVA (r = 0.255, p = 0.040), ΔBAD-D (r = 0.360, p = 0.006), and ΔSSI (r = 0.276, p = 0.039) and negatively correlated with ΔDAR (r = −0.329, p = 0.013) in multiple regression analysis. Δ mean keratometry (Km), Δ anterior chamber depth (ACD), and Δ biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) were also associated with binocular corneal differences. Conclusion: Compared to contralateral emmetropia, myopic eyes have thinner corneas and smaller corneal astigmatism. Myopic corneas exhibit relatively more regular surface morphology but are more susceptible to deformation and possess marginally inferior biomechanical properties. In addition, there is a certain correlation between anisometropia and corneal parameter asymmetry, which would be instrumental in predicting the development of myopia.

Corneal asymmetry contributes decentration in both spherical and toric orthokeratology lenses

Prediction of Orthokeratology Lens Decentration with Corneal Elevation

Corneal Elevation Asymmetry Vector as a Predictor of One-year-averaged Orthokeratology Lens Decentration in Low Astigmats

Treatment Zone Decentration During Orthokeratology on Eyes With Corneal Toricity.

Analysis of correlation between corneal topographical data and visual performance

Corneal Elevation Asymmetry Vector: Viable Predictor of Severe One-Year-averaged Orthokeratology Lens Decentration

Comparison Of Myopia Control Between Toric And Spherical Periphery Design Orthokeratology In Myopic Children With Moderate-To-High Corneal Astigmatism

Comparative analysis of corneal parameters in simple myopic anisometropia using Scheimpflug technology

To Achieve a Bullseye: Factors Related to Corneal Refractive Therapy Orthokeratology Lens Toricity

Biometric factors and orthokeratology lens parameters can influence the treatment zone diameter on corneal topography in Corneal Refractive Therapy lens wearers

Factors Related to Corneal Refractive Therapy Orthokeratology Lens Toricity

Effect of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness on Corneal Spherical Aberration and Asphericity in Mild and Moderate Myopes

Enhanced morphological assessment based on interocular asymmetry analysis for keratoconus detection

Corneal asphericity and its related factors in 1052 Chinese subjects

Two-Dimensional Peripheral Refraction and Higher-Order Wavefront Aberrations Induced by Orthokeratology Lenses Decentration

The Effect of Corneal Power Distribution on Axial Elongation in Children Using Three Different Orthokeratology Lens Designs

Posterior Corneal Characteristics of Cataract Patients with High Myopia.

Increased Corneal Toricity after Long-Term Orthokeratology Lens Wear

Corneal Surface Elevation and Thickness in Relation to the Fit of Rigid Contact Lenses in Keratoconus and After Corneal Cross-Linking

Effect of intracorneal ring segment implantation on high order aberrations comparing patients with eccentric versus central keratoconus

Correlations of Corneal Spherical Aberration with Astigmatism and Axial Length in Cataract Patients