Rapid discharge after anatomic lung resection: Is ambulatory surgery for early lung cancer possible?

Daniel P Dolan,Maxime Visa,Dan Lee,Kalvin C Lung,Diego Avella Patino,Chitaru Kurihara,Rafael Garza-Castillon,David D Odell,Ankit Bharat,Samuel Kim,Daniel P. Dolan,Kalvin C. Lung,David D. Odell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.07.046
2023-08-16
Abstract:BACKGROUND Given resource constraints during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, we explored whether minimally invasive anatomic lung resections for early-stage lung cancer could undergo rapid discharge. METHODS All patients with clinical stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer from 9/2019-6/2022 who underwent minimally invasive anatomic lung resection at a single institution were included. Patients discharged without a chest tube <18 hours following surgery, after meeting pre-set criteria, were considered 'rapid discharge.' Demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and 30-day outcomes were compared between rapid discharge patients and non-rapid discharged 'control' patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for predictors of non-rapid discharge. RESULTS Overall, 430 patients underwent resection (200 lobectomies/ 230 segmentectomies); 162 patients (37%) underwent rapid discharge and 268 patients (63%) were controls. The rapid discharge group was younger (66.5 vs 70.0 years, p<0.001), had lower American Society of Anesthesiology score (p=0.02), more segmentectomies than lobectomies (p=0.003), and smaller tumor size (p<0.001). There were no differences between groups in distance from home to hospital (p=0.335) or readmission rates (p=0.39). Increasing age had higher odds for non-rapid discharge, odds ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 1.02-1.07), while segmentectomy had decreased odds, odds ratio 0.46 (95% confidence interval 0.28-0.75). CONCLUSIONS Approximately 37% of the patients underwent rapid discharge following surgery with similar readmission rate to controls. Increasing age had higher odds for non-rapid discharge; segmentectomy was likely to lead to rapid discharge. Consideration of rapid discharge minimally invasive lung resection for early-stage lung cancer can result in significant reduction in inpatient resources without adverse patient outcomes.
surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?