Abstract:Purpose: Current literatures confirmed the widespread and frequent development of both intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) among the critically ill with a significant associated risk of organ failure and increased mortality. The 2004 International ACS Consensus Conference committee proposed that intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) be measured in complete supine position; however, the supine position of intensive care unit (ICU) patients (<30 degrees of bed increase) presented a significant risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Therefore, the potential contribution of head of bed (HOB) position in elevating IAP should be considered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of body positioning on IAP measurement and the effect of IAP at different body positions on organ function and prognosis in critically ill patients.Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of different patient positioning on IAP, organ function, and prognosis was conducted on 88 patients admitted to a medical-surgical ICU. On admission, patients' epidemiological data and risk factors for IAH were studied; daily mean IAPs, abdominal perfusion pressure, filtration gradient, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, sequential organ failure assessment score, and multiple organ dysfunction scores were registered; next, conventional hemodynamic variables, intrathoracic blood volume index, global end-diastolic volume index and extravascular lung water using the pulse contour cardiac output system were recorded. Intra-abdominal pressures were recorded through a bladder catheter every 4 hours on the first day. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured with the patient HOB increases from 0 degrees to 45 degrees. Mean arterial pressure was recorded simultaneously, whereas abdominal perfusion pressure and filtration gradient (FG) were also calculated simultaneously.Results: The main results of this study were the incidence of IAH (28.4%) and ACS (2.3%) in ICU patients; the significant and independent relationship between IAP and HOB increases. Considering the absolute numbers of IAP, the HOB of 10 degrees and 20 degrees showed slight differences, whereas that of 30 degrees and 45 degrees showed clinically significant differences; HOB elevation was associated with clinically significant decreases in abdominal perfusion pressure and FG; patients with IAH were prone to the development of shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and exhibited significantly lower intrathoracic blood volume index and global end-diastolic volume index and higher extravascular lung water.Conclusions: There is a significant and independent relationship between IAP and HOB positioning in critically ill patients, with the HOB of 30 degrees and 45 degrees showing significant difference. Abdominal perfusion pressure and FG are significantly decreased when the patient's HOB is elevated. The potential contribution of body position in elevating IAP should be considered in critically ill patients with the risk of IAH and ACS. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Continuous passive paracentesis versus large-volume paracentesis in the prevention and treatment of intra-abdominal hypertension in the critically ill cirrhotic patient with ascites (COPPTRIAHL): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in the critically ill liver cirrhotic patient-prevalence and clinical outcomes. A multicentric retrospective cohort study in intensive care

Clinical Study of the Influence of Continuous Hemofiltration on Gastrointestinal Dysfunction of the Patients with Intra-Abdominal Hypertension

Current Recognition and Management of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome among Tertiary Chinese Intensive Care Physicians

[The Monitoring of Intra-Abdominal Pressure in Critically Ill Patients].

Palliative long-term abdominal drains vs large volume paracenteses for the management of refractory ascites in end-stage liver disease

Abdominal paracentesis drainage improves outcome of acute pancreatitis complicated with intra-abdominal hypertension in early phase

Adjunctive Continuous High-Volume Hemofiltration in Acute Severe Pancreatitis Patients: A Retrospective Study

Early Diagnostic Paracentesis Improves Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis and Ascites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Permanent indwelling peritoneal catheters for palliation of refractory ascites in end‐stage liver disease: A systematic review

The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for the Management of Ascites in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis

Early-TIPS Versus Current Standard Therapy for Acute Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis Patients: A Systemic Review With Meta-analysis

Adjunctive Continuous High-Volume Hemofiltration in Patients with Acute Severe Pancreatitis: a Prospective Nonrandomized Study.

Central venous pressure catheter for large-volume paracentesis in refractory ascites

Innovative approaches to the management of ascites in cirrhosis

The Evaluation Of The Effect Of Body Positioning On Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement And The Effect Of Intra-Abdominal Pressure At Different Body Positioning On Organ Function And Prognosis In Critically Ill Patients

Intestinal fatty acid binding protein as a marker for intra-abdominal pressure-related complications in patients admitted to the intensive care unit; study protocol for a prospective cohort study (I-Fabulous study)

Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: A study protocol

Intra-Abdominal Hypertension: A Systemic Complication of Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Different timing for abdominal paracentesis catheter placement and drainage in severe acute pancreatitis complicated by intra-abdominal fluid accumulation

S1687 Patients Have Poor One Year Outcomes After Requiring Large Volume Paracentesis