Abstract:Background Beyond the observation that patients with low CFR indicating presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) have an unfavourable prognosis compared to patients with preserved CFR, recent large multicentre trials [1-2] have shown that increased minimal hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR or IMR) ,neither on top of the low CFR nor alone, does not play a role as a prognostic factor for ischemia in nonobstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) patients. Purpose This study investigates the pathophysiological interactive processes in CMD and no-CMD groups with high and low HMR taking into account potential adaptive mechanisms that alter arterial reservoir function [3] associated with microvascular resistance and systemic vasomotor response in INOCA patients. Methods Analysis was conducted on 312 unique unobstructed vessels (FFR>0.80) from 258 patients (73% male) enrolled in the DEFINE-FLOW [4] study. CFR and HMR were quantified using intracoronary Doppler and pressure measurements. Vessels were categorized into four groups based on high and low CFR and HMR using the best available cut-off values (2.5 for both). Arterial reservoir capacity (ARC) and related parameters [3] were quantified using reservoir-excess pressure (Preservoir and Pexcess) analysis of averaged aortic and distal coronary pressure waveforms in CMD (CFR<2.5) and no-CMD (CFR≥2.5) subgroups. (Figure 1-2) Results Compared to vessels without CMD, functional and structural CMD have increased Pexcess (p:0.007) and a rapid decline in diastolic pressure (DRCcoronary p<0.001, DRCaortic, p<0.05), indicating the ongoing systemic hemodynamic superfluous state despite locally suppressed resting blood flow in the structural CMD. Higher baseline microvascular resistance (BMR) was associated with increased reservoir pressure (r:0.302, p<0.001). The vessels with preserved CFR despite high HMR are characterised by uniquely increased ARC (p:0.014), effectively diminished Pexcess (p:0.010), which parallels the local (highest BMR p<0.001) and global (lowest DRCaortic, p<0.05) vasomotor response, that normalizes the systemic and local hyperperfusion, and ultimately regains an adequate flow reserve (CFR) (p<0.001). The high HMR in this group was mainly due to increased resting tonus unlike structural CMD, evident by the highest RRR (BMR/HMR).(p<0.001) (Figure 1-2) Conclusion(s) The high HMR despite preserved CFR vessels form a unique-adaptive group, characterised by substantially increased arterial reservoir capacity and effectively diminished Pexcess, by means of an adaptive vasomotor response which manifests locally in the coronary bed as pronouncedly augmented BMR & RRR, and globally as reduced DRC in the aortic pressure waveform. This adaptive myogenic response normalising resting flow and ongoing systemic and local hyperperfusion ultimately regains an adequate flow reserve (CFR).Figure 1.Methods and Main FindingsFigure 2.Visual

Particularities of coronary physiology in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from combined pressure and flow indices measurements

4D Flow Component Reveals Left Ventricular Function in Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Implications of Three-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement

The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

The relationship between the basal coronary translesional pressure ratio and fractional flow reserve

Determinants of Functional Significance of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions and Clinical Outcomes after Physiology-Guided Treatment

Impaired coronary blood flow at higher heart rates during atrial fibrillation: Investigation via multiscale modelling

The Differences of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Coronary Artery Stenosis with or Without Atrial Fibrillation

Role of physiology in the management of multivessel disease among patients with acute coronary syndrome

The interplay between coronary microvascular resistance, arterial reservoir function and coronary flow reserve: unravelling the significance of high microvascular resistance

P5620Clinical and hemodynamic determinants of coronary flow reserve in non-obstructed coronary arteries - A patient level pooled analysis of the DEBATE and ILIAS studies

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure: Characterization of Patterns in HFrEF Versus HFpEF

Abstract 12454: Prognostic Value of Computational Pressure-Flow Dynamics Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Non-Culprit Vessels Among Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease

Use of coronary physiology to guide revascularization in clinical practice: results of the F(FR)2 registry

[Real-time coronary blood flow measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation: a study using a catheter-tip Doppler velocimeter]

Is atrial fibrillation in HFpEF a distinct phenotype? Insights from multiparametric MRI and circulating biomarkers

Coronary microvascular dysfunction and future risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Asymmetric dimethylarginine is associated with the phenomenon of coronary slow flow in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Blood haemoglobin, renal insufficiency, fractional flow reserve and plasma NT-proBNP is associated with index of microcirculatory resistance in chronic coronary syndrome