Blockade of endogenous insulin receptor signaling in the nucleus tractus solitarius potentiates exercise pressor reflex function in healthy male rats

Juan A. Estrada,Norio Hotta,Han‐Kyul Kim,Rie Ishizawa,Ayumi Fukazawa,Gary A. Iwamoto,Scott A. Smith,Wanpen Vongpatanasin,Masaki Mizuno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202300879RR
2023-08-13
The FASEB Journal
Abstract:During exercise the brainstem integrates sensory information from skeletal muscle afferents and arterial baroreceptors, resulting in controlled increases in blood pressure. The influence of central insulin signaling on the exercise pressor reflex (EPR) is undetermined. Insulin hyperpolarizes neurons, thus antagonizing insulin receptors (IRs) (GSK1838705) decreases hyperpolarization. Therefore, we hypothesized that IR signaling in the brainstem influences the EPR. The EPR was potentiated by microinjection of GSK1838705 into the brainstem in rats with intact arterial baroreceptors. Insulin not only regulates glucose and/or lipid metabolism but also modulates brain neural activity. The nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) is a key central integration site for sensory input from working skeletal muscle and arterial baroreceptors during exercise. Stimulation of the skeletal muscle exercise pressor reflex (EPR), the responses of which are buffered by the arterial baroreflex, leads to compensatory increases in arterial pressure to supply blood to working muscle. Evidence suggests that insulin signaling decreases neuronal excitability in the brain, thus antagonizing insulin receptors (IRs) may increase neuronal excitability. However, the impact of brain insulin signaling on the EPR remains fully undetermined. We hypothesized that antagonism of NTS IRs increases EPR function in normal healthy rodents. In decerebrate rats, stimulation of the EPR via electrically induced muscle contractions increased peak mean arterial pressure (MAP) responses 30 min following NTS microinjections of an IR antagonist (GSK1838705, 100 μM; Pre: Δ16 ± 10 mmHg vs. 30 min: Δ23 ± 13 mmHg, n = 11, p = .004), a finding absent in sino‐aortic baroreceptor denervated rats. Intrathecal injections of GSK1838705 did not influence peak MAP responses to mechano‐ or chemoreflex stimulation of the hindlimb muscle. Immunofluorescence triple overlap analysis following repetitive EPR stimulation increased c‐Fos overlap with EPR‐sensitive nuclei and IR‐positive cells relative to sham operation (p
What problem does this paper attempt to address?