Abstract:The deleterious effects of anesthetic agents in patients suffering from coronary artery disease are well known. The risk increases when a patient has compromised ventricular function. There is a paucity of literature regarding the choice of the suitable agent to avoid deleterious effects in such patients. The use of etomidate and propofol has been considered superior to other intravenous anesthetic agents in these groups of patients. The aim of the present study is to compare the hemodynamic effects of anesthesia induction with etomidate, thiopentone, propofol, and midazolam in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. This randomized clinical trail was conducted at the All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Sixty patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 45%) scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass surgery participated in this study. After stabilization baseline hemodynamic data stroke volume variation and systemic vascular resistance index were recorded for all patients (Flo Trac TM sensor with Vigileo cardiac output monitor used for hemodynamic monitoring). The patients were randomly alloted to one of the four groups and the intravenous induction agent was administered for over 60-90 seconds (Group E--Etomidate 0.2 mg/Kg; Group M--Midazolam 0.15 mg/Kg; Group T--Thiopentone 5 mg/Kg; Group P--Propofol 1.5 mg/Kg). Hemodynamic data were recorded at one minute intervals starting from induction till seven minutes after intubation,--the end point of the present study. There was a significant decrease in the heart rate in comparison to the baseline(-7 to -15%, P = 0.001), mean arterial pressure (-27 to -32%, P = 0.001), cardiac index (-36 to -38%, P = 0.001), and stroke volume index (-27 to -34%, P = 0.001) after induction in all four groups. The hemodynamic response was similar in all the four groups. There was no significant change in central venous pressure and stroke volume variation (SVV) during induction and intubation, while the effects on the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were variable. The midazolam group was the most effective in preventing intubation stress (tachycardia,hypertension). The change from baseline values in heart rate (+ 4%, P = 0.12) and mean arterial pressure (-1%, P = 0.77) after intubation were not statistically significant in the midazolam group. The etomidate group was the least effective of all the four groups in minimizing stress response, with statistically significant increase from baseline in both heart rate (P = 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (P = 0.001) at 1 minute after intubation. All the four anesthetic agents were acceptable for induction in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction despite a 30-40% decrease in the cardiac index. Clinician experience along with knowledge of the potential interactions (e.g., premedication, concurrent opioid use) is needed to determine hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in these patients with ventricular dysfunction.

Tolerability and efficacy of a reduced dose adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance protocol under general anesthesia in infants and children

Effect of Remimazolam Tosilate Versus Etomidate on Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized trial of anesthetic induction agents in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction

Safety of Adenosine in Stress Cerebral Perfusion Imaging

Safety of adenosine for pediatric tachyarrhythmia treatment in the emergency department: a multi-hospital 10-year cross-sectional study

Safety and clinical impact of adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance in Asian patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

Utility and Clinical Profile of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedures: A Matched Controlled Analysis

Feasibility Study of Adenosine Stress Brain Blood Flow Perfusion Imaging

Effects of Dexmedetomidine As an Adjuvant to General Anesthesia on Perioperative Hemodynamic Reaction in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: a Pilot Study

In vivo assessment of coronary flow and cardiac function after bolus adenosine injection in adenosine receptor knockout mice

Adenosine and a Selective A2a Receptor Agonist Regadenoson Used in Myocardial Stress Test

Tolerance and diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated adenosine infusion for myocardial scintigraphy: A randomized, prospective study

Adenosine For Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Usefulness of deep sedation with intravenous dexmedetomidine and midazolam in cardiac catheterization procedures for pediatric patients

Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane

Adenosine vs. regadenoson for stress induction in dynamic CT perfusion scan of the myocardium: A single‑center retrospective comparison

Effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in children with tetralogy of Fallot undergoing corrective cardiac surgery: A randomized trial

A clinical trial of ketamine and midazolam as rectal premedication for preoperative child with congenital heart disease

Three Hours Continuous Injection of Adenosine Improved Left Ventricular Function and Infarct Size in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Comparison of Adrenal Suppression between Etomidate and Dexmedetomidine in Children with Congenital Heart Disease

Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass