Abstract:With the Paris target of limiting global warming to well below 2 °C until 2100, at best even 1.5 °C, the question arises what this implies for the EU’s mitigation targets and strategies. In this article, the reduction of carbon intensities and energy uses in the most ambitious mitigation scenarios for the EU, France, Germany, Italy, and the UK are compared to those of the EU in global 1.5 and 2 °C scenarios. An index decomposition analysis is applied to energy supply and each end-use sector (industry, buildings, and transport) to identify the main differences. From this, we derive conclusions concerning policies and indicators for an EU mitigation strategy compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The index decomposition shows that reducing energy use is a stronger lever in the evaluated national scenarios than in the international scenarios for all end-use sectors. The reasons for that are the lower utilization of CCS, the inclusion of additional technology options, and a detailed consideration of sufficiency in the national scenarios. The results suggest that including more ambitious demand-side mitigation options (sufficiency, energy efficiency, electrification, and fuel switching) can significantly reduce the need for negative emissions that are required in all the existing 1.5 °C-compatible global scenarios. Driving these options requires substantial enhancement of current policies for all end-use sectors. In addition, certain index decomposition approaches are shown to underrate the long-term contributions of demand-side mitigation. Accordingly, demand-side mitigation tends to be under-represented in progress indicators for the Paris Agreement, which calls for improvements.

Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5 C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C

Exploring Global Climate Policy Futures and Their Representation in Integrated Assessment Models

Exploring Fair and Ambitious Mitigation Contributions under the Paris Agreement Goals

Assessing China’s efforts to pursue the 1.5 C warming limit

Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement

Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models

Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways

Assessing China’s Efforts to Pursue the 1.5°C Warming Limit

Assessing China's efforts to pursue the 1.5°C warming limit

Locked into Copenhagen pledges—implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals

Global roll-out of comprehensive policy measures may aid in bridging emissions gap

Erratum To: Implication of Paris Agreement in the Context of Long-Term Climate Mitigation Goals

Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5 °C

A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal

An Assessment of Near-to-Mid-Term Economic Impacts and Energy Transitions under “2 °C” and “1.5 °C” Scenarios for India

Achievability of the Paris targets in the EU—the role of demand-side-driven mitigation in different types of scenarios

Extending Near‐Term Emissions Scenarios to Assess Warming Implications of Paris Agreement NDCs

CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: dynamic and international aspects of climate policies

Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy