Abstract:Background Our understanding of the composition, function, and health implications of human microbiota has been advanced by high-throughput sequencing and the development of new genomic analyses. However, trade-offs among alternative strategies for the acquisition and analysis of sequence data remain understudied. Methods We assessed eight popular taxonomic profiling pipelines; MetaPhlAn2, metaMix, PathoScope 2.0, Sigma, Kraken, ConStrains, Centrifuge and Taxator-tk, against a battery of metagenomic datasets simulated from real data. The metagenomic datasets were modeled on 426 complete or permanent draft genomes stored in the Human Oral Microbiome Database and were designed to simulate various experimental conditions, both in the design of a putative experiment; read length (75–1,000 bp reads), sequence depth (100K–10M), and in metagenomic composition; number of species present (10, 100, 426), species distribution. The sensitivity and specificity of each of the pipelines under various scenarios were measured. We also estimated the relative root mean square error and average relative error to assess the abundance estimates produced by different methods. Additional datasets were generated for five of the pipelines to simulate the presence within a metagenome of an unreferenced species, closely related to other referenced species. Additional datasets were also generated in order to measure computational time on datasets of ever-increasing sequencing depth (up to 6 × 10 7 ). Results Testing of eight pipelines against 144 simulated metagenomic datasets initially produced 1,104 discrete results. Pipelines using a marker gene strategy; MetaPhlAn2 and ConStrains, were overall less sensitive, than other pipelines; with the notable exception of Taxator-tk. This difference in sensitivity was largely made up in terms of runtime, significantly lower than more sensitive pipelines that rely on whole-genome alignments such as PathoScope2.0. However, pipelines that used strategies to speed-up alignment between genomic references and metagenomic reads, such as kmerization, were able to combine both high sensitivity and low run time, as is the case with Kraken and Centrifuge. Absent species genomes in the database mostly led to assignment of reads to the most closely related species available in all pipelines. Our results therefore suggest that taxonomic profilers that use kmerization have largely superseded those that use gene markers, coupling low run times with high sensitivity and specificity. Taxonomic profilers using more time-consuming read reassignment, such as PathoScope 2.0, provided the most sensitive profiles under common metagenomic sequencing scenarios. All the results described and discussed in this paper can be visualized using the dedicated R Shiny application ( https://github.com/microgenomics/HumanMicrobiomeAnalysis ). All of our datasets, pipelines and results are made available through the GitHub repository for future benchmarking.

Improving Taxonomic Classification with Feature Space Balancing

Resource saving taxonomy classification with k-mer distributions and machine learning

Spaced seeds improve k-mer-based metagenomic classification

Large-scale Machine Learning for Metagenomics Sequence Classification

Real-time Taxonomic Characterization of Long-read Mixed-species Sequencing Samples in Sorted Motif Distance Space:

META$^\mathbf{2}$: Memory-efficient taxonomic classification and abundance estimation for metagenomics with deep learning

Benchmarking bacterial taxonomic classification using nanopore metagenomics data of several mock communities

Robust taxonomic classification of uncharted microbial sequences and bins with CAT and BAT

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications in Metagenomic Taxonomy and Functional Annotation

DSNetax: a deep learning species annotation method based on a deep-shallow parallel framework

Leveraging Large Language Models for Metagenomic Analysis

DisBalance: a platform to automatically build balance-based disease prediction models and discover microbial biomarkers from microbiome data

Taxometer: Improving taxonomic classification of metagenomics contigs

Sparse distance-based learning for simultaneous multiclass classification and feature selection of metagenomic data

Exploiting Topic Modeling to Boost Metagenomic Reads Binning.

Embracing Ambiguity in the Taxonomic Classification of Microbiome Sequencing Data

Evaluation of computational methods for human microbiome analysis using simulated data

BarcodeBERT: Transformers for Biodiversity Analysis

A hybrid approach to invertebrate biomonitoring using computer vision and DNA metabarcoding

MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes

Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification