Abstract:<h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>Pregnancies complicated by late‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) are at increased risk of short‐ and long‐term morbidities. Despite this, identification of cases at higher risk of adverse perinatal outcome when FGR is diagnosed is challenging. The aims of this study were to elucidate the strength of association and predictive accuracy of maternal and fetal Dopplers in predicting perinatal outcome of fetuses affected by late‐onset FGR at the time of diagnosis.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Prospective study of consecutive singleton pregnancies complicated by late‐onset FGR. Estimated fetal weight (EFW), pulsatility index (PI) in the uterine, umbilical (UA), and middle cerebral (MCA) arteries, cerebro‐placental ratio (CPR) and umbilical vein flow (normalized for fetal abdominal circumference) (UVBF/AC) were recorded at the time of the diagnosis of FGR. Composite adverse outcome was defined as the occurrence of either emergency caesarean section (CS) for fetal distress, 5' Apgar score < 7, umbilical artery pH < 7.10 and neonatal admission to special care unit. Logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to elucidate the strength of association and diagnostic accuracy of different ultrasound parameters for the prediction of composite adverse outcome.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>243 consecutive singleton pregnancies complicated by late‐onset FGR were included in the study. Composite adverse perinatal outcome occurred 32.5% (95% CI 26.7‐38.8) of cases. The z values of mean uterine artery PI (2.23±1.34 vs. 1.988±0.89, p= 0.02) were higher, while the z‐values of UVBF/AC (‐1.93±0.88 vs. 0.89±0.94 p≤0.0001), MCA PI (‐1.56±0.93 vs. ‐1.22±0.84, p=0.004) and CPR (‐1.89±1.12 vs. ‐1.44±1.02, p=0.002) were lower in pregnancies who experienced compared to those who did not experience composite adverse outcome. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, mean uterine artery PI (p= 0.04), CPR (p= 0.02) and UVBF/AC (p= 0.001) were independently associated with composite adverse perinatal outcome. UVBF/AC had an AUC of 0.723 (95% CI 0.64‐0.80) for composite adverse outcome and with a better accuracy compared to mean uterine artery (AUC: 0.593), CPR (AUC: 0.615). A multiparametric prediction model including MCA, Uterine arteries and UVBF had an AUC of 0.745 (95% CI 0.66‐0.83) for the prediction of composite adverse outcome.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>CPR and uterine artery Dopplers are independently associated with composite adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by late‐onset FGR at the time of diagnosis. Despite this, their diagnostic performance for adverse perinatal outcome is low. UVBF/AC showed a better accuracy for composite adverse outcome, although its usefulness in clinical practice as standalone test for adverse pregnancy outcome requires further evidence.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>

Investigation of serum afamin concentration in pregnant women diagnosed with late fetal growth restriction or small for gestational age fetus

The Role of High Concentrations of Homocysteine for the Development of Fetal Growth Restriction

Galectin-1 Expression in the Serum and Placenta of Pregnant Women with Fetal Growth Restriction and Its Significance

Role of Inflammatory Markers and Doppler Parameters in Late‐Onset Fetal Growth Restriction: A Machine‐Learning Approach

Fetal epicardial fat thickness and modified myocardial performance index in late‐onset fetal growth restriction

Maternal serum midkine level in fetal growth restriction: a case-control study

Evaluation of systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction

Expression and significance of CEMIP and CYP11B2 in serum in women with foetal growth restriction

Neonatal Outcomes of Infants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction during Late Pregnancy versus after Birth

Serum Follistatin-Like-3 Was Elevated in Second Trimester of Pregnant Women Who Subsequently Developed Preeclampsia

Outcome‐based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction

Amniotic fluid metabolic fingerprinting contributes to shaping the unfavourable intrauterine environment in monochorionic diamniotic twins.

Value of Fructosamine Measurement in Pregnant Women with Abnormal Glucose Tolerance

Perinatal Outcomes of Fetuses with Early Growth Restriction, Late Growth Restriction, Small for Gestational Age, and Adequate for Gestational Age

Predicting Late-Term Pregnancy: The Role of Corrected Fetal Adrenal Gland Volume in Low-Risk Pregnants

Fetal Biometry and Doppler Study for the Assessment of Perinatal Outcome in Stage I Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction

Associations of serum D-dimer and glycosylated hemoglobin levels with third-trimester fetal growth restriction in gestational diabetes mellitus

Can adverse neonatal outcome be predicted in late preterm or term fetal growth restriction?

Metabolic Dynamics and Prediction of Sfgr and Adverse Fetal Outcomes: a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Role of Doppler ultrasound at time of diagnosis of late‐onset fetal growth restriction in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: prospective cohort study