Abstract:Companies that provide a two‐sided platform for users to proactively seek a match face great challenges in increasing matching efficiency and ensuring match quality. This paper examines how information designs can be used to improve matching outcomes when users derive utility from a match's vertical attribute (i.e., quality) and its horizontal attribute (i.e., idiosyncratic fit). We consider a game‐theoretic model in which competing senders propose matching requests to competing receivers and users on the two sides are differentiated both horizontally and vertically. We first demonstrate that users' preference for the vertical attribute intensifies competition and hurts matching efficiency, and to avoid competition a sender may switch from a close receiver to a distant receiver even when the weight that he places on a match's horizontal closeness increases. Second, we examine four information designs in which one type of information from one side of the market is withheld. Designs that withhold either side's vertical information increase the number of matches, with the improvement from withholding receivers' information being greater. By contrast, designs that withhold either side's horizontal information can cause all requests to concentrate on one receiver and lead to the most severe match failure. Third, an increase in matching volume comes at the expense of certain users' welfare, as withholding one side's vertical information can hurt not only high‐quality users on both sides but also the low‐quality users on the opposite side. Although withholding one side's horizontal information may increase the matching volume under certain conditions, it can be Pareto dominated by a design that withholds one side's vertical information. Fourth, when strategic user pricing is involved, it not only redistributes user welfare but also corrects for matching distortion. Finally, in contrast to the result when strategic pricing is absent, when strategic pricing is present the platform withholding one side's vertical information can benefit all users on the opposite side, while withholding one side's horizontal information can benefit all users on the same side.

A study on two-sided matching game of virtual business partners based on heterogeneous multi-attribute preferences and subject's psychological behavior

Evaluation System of Partner Selection in Agile Virtual Enterprise

The Exploration of Optimal Selection Method of Cooperation Partners of Virtual Enterprise

A two-sided matching decision-making approach based on prospect theory under the probabilistic linguistic environment

A Two-sided Matching Approach for Partner Selection and Assessing Complementarities in Inter-firm Alliances

Multi-attribute dynamic two-sided matching method of talent sharing market in incomplete preference ordinal environment

A two-sided matching model in the context of B2B export cross-border e-commerce

Ontology Based Decision Support System for Partner Selection of Virtual Enterprises

A study on cross-border e-commerce partner selection in B2B mode

Beyond Matching: Modeling Two-Sided Multi-Behavioral Sequences for Dynamic Person-Job Fit

Dynamic Matching Bandit For Two-Sided Online Markets

Bilateral Matching Decision-Making Method Considering Regret Avoidance in Second-Hand Transactions

Research on Matching Problem of Electronic Job-broker

The Research of Virtual Enterprise Partners Selection: from Harmony Perspective

Quantitative Evaluation of Fuzzy Factors in Virtual Enterprise Partnership Selection

Mr. Right or Mr. Best: the Role of Information under Preference Mismatch in Online Dating

Information Design of Matching Platforms when User Preferences Are Bidimensional

Partners Selection Process and Optimization Model for Virtual Corporations Based on Genetic Algorithms

A Unified Model for Bi-objective Online Stochastic Bipartite Matching with Two-sided Limited Patience

Matching games with partial information

Matching Algorithms: Fundamentals, Applications and Challenges