Abstract:In this conceptual contribution, we argue that experimental investigations of phenomena in the cognitive sciences and consciousness research may benefit from a thorough integration of data acquired from the first-person perspective. We present a line of research from our lab applying this approach to the Libet task on voluntary action. In this well-known experimental paradigm, participants perform a movement at a moment of their own choice. Previous research has shown that this voluntary decision to perform the action is preceded by a specific pattern in the electroencephalogram, the so-called readiness potential. This finding that the decision is preceded (and presumably determined) by an action-related brain processes puts the neuroscientific account at odds with our subjective intuition and challenges the notion of free will. This discrepancy exemplifies the gap between neuro-cognitive models of the mind and the accounts of our conscious experience. The aim of our theoretical proposal is to enrich the study of volitional action by integrating reports from the first-person perspective with the Libet paradigm to develop a more coherent account. This provides an example of implementing the research program of neurophenomenology developed by Francisco Varela to overcome the gap between scientific accounts of the mind and subjective experience. Specifically, we show how this can be achieved by interweaving three methodological approaches: (i) adapting common neuro-cognitive paradigms (i.e., the Libet task); (ii) employing refined first-person methods such as the micro-phenomenological interview; and (iii) collaborating with experienced meditators as research participants. Our contribution demonstrates how the neurophenomenological framework can be used to shed new light on long-standing and fundamental debates in consciousness research. We show that this approach not only addresses questions of intellectual curiosity but also has concrete ethical implications for the practice of science itself, self-determination, and the accountability of the conscious subject. On the basis of our approach, meditation can be seen as a method for enhancing self-regulation and self-determination, which allows for more deliberate decisions and thus more ethical behavior.

Micro-Phenomenology as Experientially Based Access to Consciousness

Everyday Experience Study:A Unique and Heuristic Research Method

Neurophenomenology and Its Problems

Mindfulness, Phenomenology, and Psychological Science

Taking phenomenology beyond the first-person perspective: conceptual grounding in the collection and analysis of observational evidence

A Phenomenological Paradigm for Empirical Research in Psychiatry and Psychology: Open Questions

Phenomenology and Experimental Psychology: On the Prospects and Limitations of Experimental Research for a Phenomenological Epistemology

Neurophenomenology in Action: Integrating the First-Person Perspective into the Libet Experiment

Phenomenological psychology and qualitative research

Coupling First-Person Cognitive Research With Neurophilosophy and Enactivism: An Outline of Arguments

Examination of self patterns: framing an alternative phenomenological interview for use in mental health research and clinical practice

A Mathematical Perspective on Neurophenomenology

Putting the "experience" back in experience sampling: A phenomenological approach

The Confluence of Perceiving and Thinking in Consciousness Phenomenology

Debating Experimental Psychology’s Frontiers: Re-discovering Wilhelm Wundt’s Contribution to Contemporary Psychological Research

The extension of Colaizzi's method of phenomenological enquiry

Phygital marketing through the lens of neuroscience and phenomenology: an interpretivist account

Phenomenological research methods

Methodological Implications of the Phenomenon of Mispresence

Phenomenology and its application in medicine

A new experimental phenomenological method to explore the subjective features of psychological phenomena: its application to binocular rivalry