Abstract:INTRODUCTION. In the context of the active development of information technologies and their integration into the main models of judicial proceedings, the functions and role of the court in considering a criminal case on its merits have become a highly relevant topic of modern science. On one hand, many scientists have focused on strengthening the adversarial nature of legal proceedings, ensuring a balance of power between the parties, and building mechanisms to guarantee the right to judicial protection. However, legal proceedings that do not pursue any normatively fixed goals lead to excessive formalism, as the adversarial system remains the only proven method for establishing the circumstances of a case. This approach does not fully align with the principles of justice and fairness in the final verdict. The International Criminal Court (ICC) embodies a scientific approach to solving the problem of combining various forms of legal proceedings and ensuring a balance of power between the parties, partly by assigning an active role to the court and aiming to achieve truth in the process. The ICC’s criminal process results from scientific modeling that considers identified doctrinal trends. The high degree of commonality in the approaches of leading lawyers within the Rome Statute of the ICC suggests their universality. This article explores the theoretical and practical aspects of combining process models in the ICC Trial Chamber activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The methodological basis of this article comprises general scientific and special methods for understanding legal phenomena and processes in the field of international criminal procedure. These include the method of system-structural analysis, the formal logical method, the method for synthesizing sociolegal phenomena, and historical description. RESULTS. This article confirms the relevance of addressing the functions and role of the court in considering a criminal case and its merits in modern criminal procedure research. Using the ICC Trial Chamber’s regulatory and organizational peculiarities, it substantiates that the adversarial model of the criminal process does not preclude assigning an active role to the court in examining the facts to be proved. It also supports setting the goal of achieving material truth, which is essential for completing a complete, comprehensive, and objective study of the case materials. Furthermore, there are three levels in the structure of the ICC Trial Chamber’s functions and powers, each of which is embodied in law enforcement practice to facilitate a special and flexible combination of the adversarial and investigative principles of legal proceedings. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. This article proves that a court’s active role in criminal proceedings does not conflict with the adversarial nature of proceedings. An analysis of the provisions of the Rome Statute of the ICC, the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, and the jurisprudence of international tribunals highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the ICC Trial Chamber.

The Appeals Chamber’s Jurisdictional Judgment in Abd-Al-Rahman and the Issue of Applicable Law at the International Criminal Court

Aiding and Abetting and the International Criminal Court’s Bemba et al. Case: The icc Trial and Appeals Chamber Consider Article 25(3)(c) of the Rome Statute

The Nature of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (and its Amended Jurisdictional Scheme)

An Analysis of the Content of Article 12 of the Rome Statute and the Relationship Between Article 12 and Article 98

The Notion of ‘Persuasive Value’ of External Precedent in International Criminal Law

The International Criminal Court’s Selectivity and Procedural Justice

Sexual and Gender-based Violence in International Criminal Law: A Feminist Assessment of the Bemba Case

The Nature of the Rome Statute and the Place of International Law before the International Criminal Court

The Activation of the International Criminal Court’s Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression: International Institutional Law and Dispute Settlement Perspectives

The Judiciary of International Criminal Law

Theory and Practice of Mixing Procedural Models in the Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court

Electing Judges and Prosecutors of the International Criminal Court: A Reappraisal of the Practice through the Lenses of Transparency and Legitimacy

Achieving Justice for Child Survivors of Conflict-related Sexual Violence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in Light of the Kavumu Case

The Use of Precedent and External Case-Law by the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

Autonomy of Provisional Measures or Autonomy of the International Court of Justice?

"The Legal Basis for the Exercise of Jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court and the Preparatory Work of the Rome Statute (V)," Journal of International Relations and Comparative Culture, Vol. 18, No. 2 (March 2020), pp. 37-48.

18 Appeals to the Court of Appeal

Procedural Haze: The ICC’s Jurisdiction over the Situation in Palestine

Applicability of a Fork-in-the-Road Clause and the Res Judicata Principle in International Commercial Arbitration

Friendly judicial challenges from the North: The decision of the Canada Supreme Court in Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT’S JURISDICTION IN IMPUNITY PREVENTION