Abstract:This article examines few fundamental principles of Vedic astrology through a systematic empirical experiment conducted on the birth charts of people who have suffered from cancer and people who have never had it in their life. Two data sets were formed, one consisting of 254 birth charts of people who were diagnosed with cancer before the age of 60 and the other one consisting 498 birth charts of people who had a long life of more than 80 years and never had cancer in their lifetime. In the absence of an authentic list of rules that predict cancer disease, we tested these two groups through a comprehensive statistical test where we compared astrological negativity as well as positivity (claimed to give unfavourable and favourable effects respectively) of all the planets, all houses and lords of all houses (entities). It was expected that if the principles involved are true, then both datasets would differ in their averages for one or more related parameters. It was however found that there was no statistically significant difference between the two data sets in terms of astrological negativity or positivity of any of the entities we tested. Two sample T-test of significance further confirmed these observations. We tested 23 fundamental principles of astrology for 34 entities and found none of them pass through the empirical test. Though we have not tested complete scope of astrology, these principles like a planet when conjugated with Saturn or Mars gives malefic effect or other principles regarding a house that has malefic planets or a lord of house in cruel nakshatra etc. are the basics of Vedic astrology and are something that one cannot do away with if astrology has to be practiced. Their invalidity proven through our test therefore raise a lot of questions about accuracy of predictions made by Vedic astrology using them.

Assessing the Epistemic Value of Astrology: A Comparative Analysis with Other Sciences

Astrology and Science: A Precarious Relationship. Part 2: Considerations of Empirical Investigations on the Validity of Astrology

Astrology and Science: A Precarious Relationship. Part 1: Historical Review of German Astrology in the 20th Century and Current Developments

Why Astrology Doesn't Work

Fixating on the future: An overview of increased astrology use

Empirical testing of few fundamental principles of Vedic astrology through comparative analysis of astrological charts of cancer diseased persons versus persons who never had it

Astrological counseling in contemporary India

Do Astrological Beliefs Reflects Systematic Bias in Personality Measurement?

Exploring the intersections of AI (Artificial Intelligence) in psychology and astrology: a conceptual inquiry for human well-being

The epistemological status of Astrobiology: a problematic case of integration of scientific disciplines

An empirical test of the astrological theory of personality

Science Communication and Scientific Culture Research——Starting from the Criticism on Astrology in 1975

Introversion-extraversion: astrology versus psychology

A Brief History of the Development of Modern Psychological Astrology

Astrology in the Era of Exoplanets

Hiding in plain sight: Jung, astrology, and the psychology of the unconscious

Belief in Astrology as a Strategy For Self-Verification and Coping With Negative Life-Events

Using Astrology to Teach Research Methods to Introductory Psychology Students