Abstract:Background: The consumer availability and automated response functions of chat generator pretrained transformer (ChatGPT-4), a large language model, poise this application to be utilized for patient health queries and may have a role in serving as an adjunct to minimize administrative and clinical burden. Purpose: To evaluate the ability of ChatGPT-4 to respond to patient inquiries concerning ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries and compare these results with the performance of Google. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Google Web Search was used as a benchmark, as it is the most widely used search engine worldwide and the only search engine that generates frequently asked questions (FAQs) when prompted with a query, allowing comparisons through a systematic approach. The query "ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction" was entered into Google, and the top 10 FAQs, answers, and their sources were recorded. ChatGPT-4 was prompted to perform a Google search of FAQs with the same query and to record the sources of answers for comparison. This process was again replicated to obtain 10 new questions requiring numeric instead of open-ended responses. Finally, responses were graded independently for clinical accuracy (grade 0 = inaccurate, grade 1 = somewhat accurate, grade 2 = accurate) by 2 fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons (D.W.A, J.S.D.) blinded to the search engine and answer source. Results: ChatGPT-4 used a greater proportion of academic sources than Google to provide answers to the top 10 FAQs, although this was not statistically significant (90% vs 50%; P = .14). In terms of question overlap, 40% of the most common questions on Google and ChatGPT-4 were the same. When comparing FAQs with numeric responses, 20% of answers were completely overlapping, 30% demonstrated partial overlap, and the remaining 50% did not demonstrate any overlap. All sources used by ChatGPT-4 to answer these FAQs were academic, while only 20% of sources used by Google were academic (P = .0007). The remaining Google sources included social media (40%), medical practices (20%), single-surgeon websites (10%), and commercial websites (10%). The mean (± standard deviation) accuracy for answers given by ChatGPT-4 was significantly greater compared with Google for the top 10 FAQs (1.9 ± 0.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.6; P = .001) and top 10 questions with numeric answers (1.8 ± 0.4 vs 1 ± 0.8; P = .013). Conclusion: ChatGPT-4 is capable of providing responses with clinically relevant content concerning UCL injuries and reconstruction. ChatGPT-4 utilized a greater proportion of academic websites to provide responses to FAQs representative of patient inquiries compared with Google Web Search and provided significantly more accurate answers. Moving forward, ChatGPT has the potential to be used as a clinical adjunct when answering queries about UCL injuries and reconstruction, but further validation is warranted before integrated or autonomous use in clinical settings.

Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for providing orthopaedic information

ChatGPT and large language models in orthopedics: from education and surgery to research

ChatGPT can yield valuable responses in the context of orthopaedic trauma surgery

Utilization of ChatGPT for Plastic Surgery Research: Friend or Foe?

Understanding How ChatGPT May Become a Clinical Administrative Tool Through an Investigation on the Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions Concerning Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries

ChatGPT and neurosurgical education: A crossroads of innovation and opportunity

Application of ChatGPT for Orthopedic Surgeries and Patient Care

ChatGPT in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

ChatGPT in orthopedics: a narrative review exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in orthopedic practice

Use and Application of Large Language Models for Patient Questions following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Application of generative language models to orthopaedic practice

Invited Commentary on ChatGPT: What Every Pediatric Surgeon Should Know About Its Potential Uses and Pitfalls

Assessing the potential role of ChatGPT in spine surgery research

Exploring the Role of Open Artificial Intelligence Platform on Surgical Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Case Study of ChatGPT

An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research

Development and Prospect of ChatGpt in the Medical Field

Leveraging artificial intelligence in neurosurgery—unveiling ChatGPT for neurosurgical discharge summaries and operative reports

Exploring the use of ChatGPT/GPT-4 for patient follow-up after oral surgeries

ChatGPT as a Tool for Medical Education and Clinical Decision-Making on the Wards: Case Study

Assessing ChatGPT's orthopedic in-service training exam performance and applicability in the field

Evaluating capabilities of large language models: Performance of GPT-4 on surgical knowledge assessments