From private to social cost-benefit analysis: life cycle environmental impact cost internalization in cement production fuel switching

Vahakn Kabakian,Marcelle McManus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03694-z
2023-08-10
Abstract:Cement production is linked to heavy environmental load with exigences for reduction and substitution of raw materials and energy demands/sources. Recently, with the potential commercial discovery of natural gas (NG) reserves in Lebanon, discussions on the viability of fuel-switching, from petcoke (kiln processes) and heavy fuel oil (HFO) (reciprocating engines) to NG in the cement sector emerged. To that aim three alternative scenarios (SC x ) were suggested: shifting petcoke to NG in kiln processes (SC 1 ); shifting reciprocating engines from HFO to NG (SC 2 ); shifting kiln processes and reciprocating engines to NG (SC 3 ). An economic analysis indicated that SC 2 is the only viable option. This paper presents a new combination of life cycle impact assessment (LCA) and monetization to quantify environmental impacts for the decision-making processes, within the Lebanese context. The LCA was conducted using primary data and SimaPro v8.5.2.0. The functional unit (FU) was 1 kg of cement. IPCC 2013 GWP 100a V1.03, Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) V1.10 ReCiPe 2016 E v1.02 impact assessment and Stepwise2006 (V1.05.3) monetary valuation methods were used. Results indicated that all scenarios lead to a reduced carbon footprint: 0.016 kgCO 2eq. , 0.0008 kgCO 2eq. and 0.0168 kgCO 2eq. for SC 1 , SC 2 and SC 3 , respectively, from the baseline 1.0327 kgCO 2eq. . The baseline CED was 5.06 MJ, and 4.5 MJ, 4.91 MJ and 4.35 MJ for SC 1 , SC 2 , and SC 3 , respectively. SC 3 had the lowest environmental burden, followed by SC 1 and SC 2 . Damage assessment results indicated that all alternative scenarios reduce environmental damage, while SC 3 brought the highest benefit followed by SC 1 and SC 2 , respectively. Monetization results/ FU indicated a cost burden of 25.54 US¢, 24,64 US¢, 25.5 US¢ and 24.6 US¢ for baseline, SC 1 , SC 2 and SC 3 , respectively. Finally, the best fit option, after internalizing the environmental cost, shifted from SC 2 to SC 3 indicating the merits of combining LCA and monetization into decision-making processes.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?