Abstract:In his seminal paper, Holling coined the term resilience as the ability of ecosystems to absorb changes without a major transformation of system dynamics and feedbacks. This concept is becoming increasingly significant in many interdisciplinary studies, such as ecology, economics, environmental studies, sociology and political science. These studies deal with the interactions between humans and nature, providing a fresh and useful way to explore sustainable development. However, different interpretations of what is meant by resilience can cause confusion. Hence, the resilience of a system needs to be considered in terms of the attributes that govern system dynamic, based on a uniform scientific foundation. This paper first provides an overview of the related theories of adaptive cycle and of panarchy, which are newer developments drawing on the earlier work on resilience, and then traces the evolution of the concept of resilience. The meaning of resilience has evolved and expanded greatly since the 1970s, with some new insights gained during the last decade. Nowadays, the study of resilience has been incorporated into the framework of linked social-ecological systems. Resilience, for social-ecological systems, is related to (a) the magnitude of shock that the system can absorb and remain within a given state, (b) the degree to which the system is capable of self-organization, and (c) the degree to which the system can build capacity for learning and adaptation. A growing number of case studies have revealed the close connection between resilience, diversity and sustainability of social-ecological systems. Finally, we suggest some future areas of study for a better understanding of the resilience of social-ecological systems. There are still critical questions to be solved in the future, to build resilience and increase the capacity of social-ecological systems to cope with surprise in today's changing world.

Understanding the social dimensions of resilience: The role of the Social Sciences in Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Action, and Sustainable Development

Conceptualizing community resilience and the social dimensions of risk to overcome barriers to disaster risk reduction and sustainable development

What lies beyond social capital? The role of social psychology in building community resilience to climate change.

Developing an integrated framework to quantify resilience of urban systems against disasters

Promotion of community resilience: does citizens have a role to play?

Disaster Risk Resilience: Conceptual Evolution, Key Issues, and Opportunities

Characterising resilience: unpacking the concept for tackling climate change and development

Social dynamics of community resilience building in the face of climate change: the case of three Scottish communities

Workforce/Population, Economy, Infrastructure, Geography, Hierarchy, and Time (WEIGHT): Reflections on the Plural Dimensions of Disaster Resilience

Social Capital and Community Resilience

An overview on the resilience of social-ecological systems

Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach

Integrating Subjective and Objective Dimensions of Resilience in Fire-Prone Landscapes

Building a Multisystemic Understanding of Societal Resilience to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Building community resilience in a context of climate change: The role of social capital

Integrated Assessment of Climate Change Impacts and Urban Resilience: From Climate and Hydrological Hazards to Risk Analysis and Measures

Resilience to Natural Hazards: a Geographic Perspective

Assessing the Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience to Hazards.

State of the research in community resilience: progress and challenges

The concept of resilience: Dimensions, properties of resilient systems and spatial scales of resilience