Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictors of first-round attendance for breast screening in an inner city area.DESIGN: Prospective design in which women were interviewed or completed a postal questionnaire before being sent their invitation for breast screening. Sociodemographic factors, health behaviours, and attitudes, beliefs, and intentions were used as predictors of subsequent attendance. A randomised control group was included to assess the effect of being interviewed on attendance.SETTING: Three neighbouring health districts in inner south east London.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3291 women aged 50-64 years who were due to be called for breast screening for the first time. The analysis of predictors was based on a subsample of 1301, reflecting a response rate of 75% to interview and 36% to postal questionnaire.MAIN RESULTS: Attendance was 42% overall, and 70% in those who gave an interview or returned a questionnaire. There was little evidence for an interview effect on attendance. The main findings from the analysis of predictors are listed below. (These were necessarily based on those women who responded to interview/questionnaire and so may not be generalisable to the full sample.) (1) Sociodemographic factors: Women in rented accommodation were less likely to go for screening but other indicators of social class and education were not predictive of attendance. Age and other risk factors for breast cancer were unrelated to attendance, as was the distance between home and the screening centre. Married or single women were more likely to attend than divorced, separated, or widowed women, and black women had a higher than average attendance rate; however, neither of these relationships was found in the interview sample. (2) Health behaviours: Attenders were less likely to have had a recent breast screen, more likely to have had a cervical smear, more likely to go to the dentist for check ups, and differed from non-attenders with regard to drinking frequency. Exercise, smoking, diet change, and breast self-examination were unrelated to attendance. (3) Attitudes, beliefs, and intentions: The two best predictors were measures of the perceived importance of regular screening for cervical and breast cancer and intentions to go for breast screening. Also predictive were beliefs about the following: the personal consequences of going for breast screening, the effectiveness of breast screening, the chances of getting breast cancer, and the attitudes of significant others (the woman's husband/partner and children). Women who reported a moderate amount of worry about breast cancer were more likely to attend than those at the two extremes.CONCLUSIONS: Attenders and non-attenders differ in two broad areas: the health related behaviours they engage in and the attitudes, beliefs, and intentions they have towards breast cancer and breast screening. The latter are potentially amenable to change, and though different factors may operate among women who do not respond to questionnaires, the findings offer hope that attendance rates can be improved by targeting the relevant attitudes and beliefs. This could be done by changing the invitation letter and its accompanying literature, through national and local publicity campaigns, and by advice given by GPs, practice nurses, and other health professionals. It is essential that such interventions are properly evaluated, preferably in randomised controlled studies.

Optimising recruitment to a lung cancer screening trial: A comparison of general practitioner and community-based recruitment

Invitation strategies and participation in a community-based lung cancer screening programme located in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation

Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study

General practice focussed strategies to increase participation in lung cancer screening – a systematic review protocol

Implementing lung cancer screening: baseline results from a community-based ‘Lung Health Check’ pilot in deprived areas of Manchester

Personalised lung cancer risk stratification and lung cancer screening: do general practice electronic medical records have a role?

Motivation is not enough: A qualitative study of lung cancer screening uptake in Australia to inform future implementation

WELCOME-GP: A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a targeted postal cancer awareness intervention for increasing attendance at general practice

Using general practitioners to recruit individuals with low socioeconomic position to preventive health checks is feasible: a cross sectional study

Lung cancer screening: targeting the hard to reach-a review

Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate invitation to community-based low-dose CT screening for lung cancer versus usual care in a targeted population at risk

Utilisation of primary care electronic patient records for identification and targeted invitation of individuals to a lung cancer screening programme

Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) pathway navigation study: a protocol for a nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a pathway navigation intervention on lung cancer screening uptake

Proactive Recruitment Strategy for Patient Identification for Lung Cancer Screening

Recruitment strategies in a lung cancer screening program for Asian women with no smoking history.

Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.

Predictors and barriers to accepting smoking cessation support within targeted lung health screening programmes: a mixed method approach.

Factors Associated With Obtaining Lung Cancer Screening Among Persons Who Smoke

Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial

Second round results from the Manchester ‘Lung Health Check’ community-based targeted lung cancer screening pilot

Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature