Abstract:Biochar used for soil amendment is considered a viable negative emissions technology as it can be produced easily from a wide range of biomass feedstocks, while offering numerous potential agricultural benefits. This research is the first to present a comprehensive sustainability assessment of large-scale biochar production and application in Malaysia. The five feedstocks considered comprise the country's most abundant agricultural wastes from palm oil (empty fruit bunches, fibres, palm fronds and shells) and rice (straw) plantations. Combined with process simulation, life cycle assessment and life cycle costing are used to assess the sustainability of biochar production via slow pyrolysis at different temperatures (300–600 °C), considering two functional units: i) production and application of 1 t of biochar; and ii) removal of 1 t of CO 2 from the atmosphere . The cradle-to-grave system boundary comprises all life cycle stages from biomass acquisition to biochar use for soil amendment. The positive impacts of the latter, such as carbon sequestration, fertiliser avoidance and reduction in soil N 2 O emissions, are also included. The global warming potential (GWP) is net-negative in all scenarios, ranging from −436 to −2,085 kg CO 2 eq./t biochar and −660 to −933 kg CO 2 eq./t CO 2 removed. Per t of biochar, the systems with shells have the lowest GWP and those with straw the highest, all showing better performance if produced at higher pyrolysis temperatures. However, the temperature trend is opposite for all other 17 impacts considered, with fibres being the best option and fronds the worst for most categories. Per t CO 2 removed, fronds have the highest impact in eight categories, including GWP, and shells the lowest in most categories. All impacts are lower for biochar production at higher temperatures. The main hotspot is the pyrolysis process, influencing the majority of impact categories and contributing 66–75 % to the life cycle costs. The costs range from US 60–204/t CO 2 removed. The least expensive systems per t biochar are those with straws and per t CO 2 removed those with shells, while fronds are the worst option economically for both functional units. Utilising all available feedstocks could remove 6–12.4 Mt of CO 2 annually, reducing the national emissions from the agricultural sector by up to 54 % and saving US$36.05 M annually on fertilisers imports. These results will be of interest to policy makers in Malaysia and other regions with abundant agricultural wastes.

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECSS): Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of electricity generated from palm oil wastes

Assessing the Environmental Impact of Empty Fruit Bunches for Electricity Generation in Malaysia: A Life Cycle Perspective

Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of the integration of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the polygeneration system (BECCS-PS) for producing green electricity and methanol

Biochar from agricultural wastes: Environmental sustainability, economic viability and the potential as a negative emissions technology in Malaysia

Integrated Assessment of Palm Oil Mill Residues to Sustainable Electricity System (POMR-SES): A Case Study from Peninsular Malaysia

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) potential in jet fuel production from forestry residues: A combined Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment approach

Bioenergy with carbon capture, storage and utilization: Potential technologies to mitigate climate change

Which bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) pathways can provide net-negative emissions?

Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): Viability and Potential

Can bioenergy with carbon capture and storage deliver negative emissions? A critical review of life cycle assessment

Optimal Hybrid Renewable Energy System to Accelerate a Sustainable Energy Transition in Johor, Malaysia

Energetic, Exergetic, and Techno-Economic Analysis of A Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Utilization Process via Integrated Torrefaction–CLC–Methanation

Technoeconomic Analysis of Negative Emissions Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage through Pyrolysis and Bioenergy District Heating Infrastructure

Decarbonising Industry via BECCS: Promising Sectors, Challenges, and Techno-economic Limits of Negative Emissions

Capacity of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage in China Consistent with the Global Remaining Carbon Budget

Integrated spatial and pinch analysis of optimal industrial energy supply mix with consideration of BioCNG derived from palm oil mill effluent

Quantifying the global warming potential of carbon dioxide emissions from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage

Economic and environmental evaluation of coal-and-biomass-to-liquids-and-electricity plants equipped with carbon capture and storage

Potential for carbon dioxide removal of carbon capture and storage on biomass‐fired combined heat and power production

MILP model for optimal operation of biomass facility treatment for efficient oil palm biomass management

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) utilization of oil palm empty fruit bunches as bioenergy