Abstract:Background: Early results have illustrated the multiportal robotic approach to be safe and oncologically efficacious in the treatment of thoracic malignancies. Industry leaders have improved upon the lessons learned during the early multiportal studies and have now come to establish the feasibility of the biportal, and subsequently the uniportal robotic-assisted approach, all in an effort to offer patients equivalent or better outcomes with less surgical trauma. No current, coherent body of evidence currently exists outlining the early-term outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to clarify the early-phase outcomes of these patients. Methods: An electronic search of four databases was performed to identify relevant studies outlining the immediate post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries. The primary endpoint was defined as technical success (i.e., no conversion to secondary robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, or open approaches). Secondary endpoints of interest included post-operative outcomes and complication rates. A meta-analysis using a random effects model of proportions or means was applied, as appropriate. Results: The search strategy ultimately yielded 12 relevant studies for inclusion. A total of 240 patients (52% male) split across cohort studies and case reports were identified. The mean age of the two groups was 59.7±3.0 and 58.1±6.8 years, respectively. The mean operative time was 133.8±38.2 and 150.0±52.2 minutes, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 4.4±1.6 and 4.3±1.1 days, respectively. The mean blood loss was 80.0±25.1 mL The majority of identified procedures were lobectomies, segmentectomies, and wedge resections, though complex sleeve resections and anterior mediastinal mass resections were also completed. Cumulative technical success was 99.9%. Conclusions: The uniportal robotic-assisted approach, when completed in expert hands, has been illustrated to have exceedingly low rates of conversion to secondary procedures, along with short length of stay (LOS), minimal blood loss, and short procedural times (variable depending on operation type). Current evidence on the feasibility of this approach will be bolstered by upcoming multi-institutional series.

Comparison of active versus passive robotic-endoscope-holder-assisted unisurgeon uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in terms of surgical efficacy and patient safety

Comparative early results of a robotics-assisted endoscope holder in single port thoracoscopic surgery in the era of COVID-19

Uniportal versus three‐port video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non‐small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

The perioperative outcomes of uniport versus two-port and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Safety and perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: Zhongshan experience

The Application of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomical Segmentectomy for Lung Resection: A Retrospective Clinical Study

The perioperative outcomes of uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries-a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical cohort studies and case reports

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Uniport Versus Multiport Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in the Perioperative Treatment of Patients with T1–3N0M0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Uniport versus multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the perioperative treatment of patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hybrid uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery staplers: technical aspects and results

Efficacy of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for complicated pulmonary resections.

Short-term analysis of uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery via the subxiphoid approach without chest tube drainage for anterior mediastinal tumors: a comparative retrospective study

A Comparative Study of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique versus Traditional Two-Port Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique for Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Clinical applications of minimally invasive uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery

Application of three-dimensional thoracoscope system in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

A prospective study examining the impact of uniportal video‐assisted thoracic surgery on the short‐term quality of life in patients with lung cancer

Evaluating postoperative recovery in uniportal versus needlescopic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a comparable study