Abstract:Experimental findings showing that retrieved memories are labile and vulnerable to disruption have led to important theoretical ideas at a basic science level that have been applied to the clinic at a translational level. At a theoretical level, these findings suggest that retrieved memories can be modulated by behavioral or pharmacological treatments as they are reconsolidated and returned to storage. At a clinical level, these findings suggest that treatments that target reconsolidation may help dampen or even erase especially problematic memories, such as those associated with trauma. However, there are many caveats to these effects and issues that need to be considered when thinking broadly about retrieval-induced plasticity and extensions into the clinic. First, performance during a memory test often does not reflect the entirety of the animal's knowledge about a situation; asking questions in different ways may reveal the presence of a memory that was thought to be eliminated. Second, although reconsolidation and extinction are often treated as competing processes, there is abundant evidence that extinction can progress through associative and nonassociative changes in the original memory that are often described in terms of reconsolidation effects. Third, targeting a reconsolidation process as a therapeutic may not be helpful in disorders like posttraumatic stress disorder, in which traumatic experiences induce a cascade of symptoms that are self-perpetuating and may ultimately maintain themselves long after trauma. Underlying all of these challenges is the need for a rich theoretical framework focused on retrieval-induced plasticity that is informed by developments in associative learning theory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Treatment Integrity, Commission Errors, and Reinstatement: A Primer

Examination of clinical variables affecting resurgence: A reanalysis of 46 applications

A Treatment Integrity Analysis of Function-Based Intervention

Empirically deriving omission and commission errors for relapse tests: A demonstration of reverse translation.

A systematic review of enhanced resurgence paradigms

NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT AS TREATMENT FOR SEVERE PROBLEM BEHAVIOR: SOME PROCEDURAL VARIATIONS

A retrospective analysis of the relation between resurgence and renewal of behavior targeted for reduction

Treatment Integrity of Primary (Tier 1) Prevention Efforts in Tiered Systems: Mapping the Literature

Resurgence of destructive behavior following decreases in alternative reinforcement: A prospective analysis

Beyond reconsolidation: The need for a broad theoretical approach in clinical translations of research on retrieval-induced plasticity.

Treatment Integrity of Interventions With Children in the School Psychology Literature from 1995 to 2008

A Replication of a Nonsequential Renewal Model and a Failure to Attenuate Nonsequential Renewal with Extinction Cues

Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement

Evaluation of resurgence following differential reinforcement of alternative behavior with and without extinction in a human operant model

Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness

Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities

Reinforcer value moderates response magnitude and persistence during extinction: A randomized trial

Failing to forget: Prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control.

A parametric manipulation and meta-analysis of target-response punishment on resurgence

Further evidence of renewal in automatically maintained behavior