Effects of scapular treatment on chronic neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yin Chen,Chunlan Yang,Kailu Nie,Jiapeng Huang,Yun Qu,Tingting Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07220-8
IF: 2.562
2024-04-01
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Abstract:Abstract Background Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common public health problem that affects daily living activities and quality of life. There is biomechanical interdependence between the neck and scapula. Studies have shown that shoulder blade function might be related to chronic neck pain. We therefore evaluated the effects of scapular targeted therapy on neck pain and function in patients with CNP. Methods Databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via Ovid), Ovid, Web of Science, and Scopus, were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published in English investigating treatment of the scapula for CNP before July 16, 2023. Results A total of 313 participants were included from 8 RCTs. Compared with those in the control group, the intervention in the scapular treatment group exhibited greater improvement in pain intensity (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 2.55; 95% CI = 0.97 to 4.13; P = 0.002), with moderate evidence. Subgroup analysis for pain intensity revealed a significant difference between the sexes, with only the female population (SMD = 6.23, 95% CI = 4.80 to 7.65) showing better outcomes than those with both sexes (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.56) ( p < 0.00001). However, moderate evidence demonstrated no improvement in neck disability after scapular treatment (SMD of 0.24[-0.14, 0.62] of Neck Disability Index or Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire). No effect of scapular treatment was shown on the pressure pain threshold (PPT). The cervical range of motion (CROM) and electromyographic activity of neck muscles could not be conclusively evaluated due to limited support in the articles, and further study was needed. However, the patient’s head forward posture appeared to be corrected after scapular treatment. Conclusion Scapular therapy was beneficial for relieving pain intensity in patients with CNP, especially in women. Head forward posture might also be corrected with scapular therapy. However, scapular therapy may have no effect on the PPT or neck disability. However, whether scapular therapy could improve CROM and cervical muscle activation in patients with CNPs had not been determined and needed further study.
rheumatology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper This paper aims to evaluate the impact of targeted scapular treatment on pain intensity and function in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP). Specifically, the study investigates through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) whether scapular treatments (including stabilization exercises, corrective exercises, and thoracic-scapular joint mobilization) can effectively reduce pain intensity and improve neck function in patients with chronic neck pain. ### Research Background and Objectives Chronic neck pain is a common public health issue that affects daily activities and quality of life. Studies suggest that scapular function may be related to chronic neck pain. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to assess whether treatments targeting the scapula can effectively alleviate pain and improve neck function in patients with chronic neck pain. The study particularly focuses on the effect of pain relief in female patients. ### Main Findings 1. **Pain Intensity**: Compared to the control group, the scapular treatment group showed a significant reduction in pain intensity (Standardized Mean Difference SMD = 2.55; 95% CI = 0.97 to 4.13; P = 0.002). 2. **Gender Differences**: Studies including only female participants showed better pain relief effects (SMD = 6.23, 95% CI = 4.80 to 7.65), whereas studies including both male and female participants showed weaker effects (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.56). 3. **Neck Disability Status**: Scapular treatment did not significantly improve neck disability (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI = -0.14 to 0.62). 4. **Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)**: Scapular treatment had no significant effect on PPT. 5. **Cervical Range of Motion (CROM)**: The limited number of existing studies makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. 6. **Electromyographic Activity**: Scapular treatment improved the activation level of certain muscles (such as the upper trapezius), but overall evidence is insufficient. 7. **Forward Head Posture**: Scapular treatment may help correct forward head posture. ### Conclusion Scapular treatment is beneficial for alleviating pain intensity in patients with chronic neck pain, with particularly better effects observed in female patients. However, scapular treatment does not significantly improve pressure pain threshold or neck disability. Additionally, further research is needed to determine whether scapular treatment can improve cervical range of motion and neck muscle activation.