Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.

W. Assunção,Alessandra Cardoso,É. A. Gomes,L. F. Tabata,P. H. dos Santos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00308.x

2008-12-01

Journal of Prosthodontics

Abstract:PURPOSE This study evaluated the influence of surface abrasion of transfer copings to obtain a precise master cast for a partially edentulous restoration with different inclinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Replicas (N = 30) of a metal matrix (control group) containing two implants at 90 degrees and 65 degrees in relation to the benchtop were obtained using a polyether impression material and three impression techniques: square impression copings splint with dental floss and autopolymerizing acrylic resin (TRS), square impression copings abraded with aluminum oxide (TA), and square impression copings abraded with aluminum oxide and adhesive-coated (TAA). The replicas obtained in type V stone were digitalized, and the images were exported to AutoCAD software to perform the readings of possible degree alterations in implant inclinations. The results were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test (alpha < 0.05). RESULTS Comparing the techniques with regard to the 90 degrees implant inclination, no statistical difference was observed between the three techniques and the control group. Analyzing the three techniques with regard to the 65 degrees implant inclination, no significant difference was seen between technique TA and the control group. CONCLUSIONS Technique TA presented more accurate master casts than TRS and TAA techniques. The angulated implant (65 degrees ) tended to generate more imprecise master casts than implants perpendicular to the surface.