Abstract:Purpose Because corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports in China are surging in quantity but are low in quality, impression management in CSR reports has become a hot research topic in recent years. This paper aims to research whether and how media coverage affects CSR report impression management and whether CSR report disclosure attributes have different regulating effects. Design/methodology/approach Based on the effective supervision hypothesis and the market pressure hypothesis, this study uses Heckman’s two-stage regression model to examine the effect of media coverage on CSR report impression management from the perspective of managers’ self-interest. Findings The results support the market pressure hypothesis, which suggest that firms with higher levels of media coverage are more likely to engage in CSR report impression management, and this effect is especially significant in firms with a higher proportion of institutional investor shareholding and more analysts tracking. Further cross-sectional group studies show that market pressure is only present in firms whose CSR reports are subject to mandatory disclosure without third-party assurance or policy-oriented media attention. Research limitations/implications This paper does not consider the attention of other forms of media. The findings of this paper has policy implications for a better understanding of the motivation underlying impression management in CSR reports, encouraging voluntary disclosure and assurance to relieve the market pressure from media coverage. Practical implications From the perspective impression management of social responsibility report, further understanding the governance role of media coverage. A large number of previous literatures have shown that media coverage has a good supervisory role, but these studies mainly focus on the financial level of enterprises. Media coverage seems to be a “double-edged sword”. While it plays a supervisory role and inhibits earnings management or irregularities at the financial level, it also brings enormous market pressure to the enterprises, which is reflected in the increase of impression management behavior of social responsibility reports at the non-financial level, and this pressure is probably caused by the financial level. Social implications Voluntary disclosure and verification of social responsibility reports, as an important mechanism to improve the quality of social responsibility reports, supports the correctness, scientificity and rationality of the current policies of the SFC and the exchange on encouraging voluntary disclosure and verification. In the future, changing regulatory thinking, encouraging voluntary disclosure of social responsibility reports and introducing more independent and authoritative certification agencies should be the direction and focus of policy-making, so that social responsibility reports can play a better role in helping investors make decisions. Originality/value From the perspective of impression management of CSR reports, this paper provides evidence regarding the effect of media coverage and its transmission mechanisms. This paper uses China's unique institutional environments to study the impact of different types of media coverage on impression management in CSR reports in emerging market economy. Different from the institutional environment of developed countries such as the USA, mandatory disclosure and voluntary disclosure coexist in CSR reporting in China. The authors provide critical evidence to show that third-party assurance and voluntary disclosure improves the quality of CSR reports.

Does better CSR disclosure minimise the problem of asymmetric financial reporting? The role of market supervision

How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Have Influence on Firms' Access to Trade Credit

Corporate social responsibility, market reaction and accounting conservatism

Does CSR Information Disclosure Improve Investment Efficiency? The Moderating Role of Analyst Attention

Corporate social responsibility and financial statement comparability: Evidence from China

Ownership Structure, Institutional Environment, and the Economic Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Market Supervision, and Green Investment

Corporate Social Responsibility, Analyst Focus and Firm Performance

Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China

Information disclosure as a means of minimizing asymmetric financial reporting: The role of market reaction

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Catering to Investor Sentiment in China

Does corporate social responsibility disclosure reduce the information disadvantage of foreign investors?

Can enhanced CSR quality reduce the cost of debt capital? An empirical analysis of CEO expertise and non-financial reporting practices in China

Mandatory CSR Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Properties: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Quality and Firms' Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Innovation Sustainability: Evidence from China

Media coverage and impression management in corporate social responsibility reports

Do Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Convey Value Relevant Information? Evidence from Report Readability and Tone

Does corporate social responsibility affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk: does analyst coverage matter?

Does CSR Moderate the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Chinese Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) Firms