Abstract:223 Background: Serious illness conversations (SICs) about patients’ values and care preferences are tied to improved outcomes and quality of life. However, SICs can be hard to implement early in the cancer care journey, and questions remain about how and when to start. Following a pragmatic trial testing behavioral nudges to promote SICs in oncology (NCT04867850), we used an explanatory-sequential mixed methods design to gauge patient and clinician perspectives on the best communication strategy for SICs. Methods: Thirty patients with cancer at high mortality risk and 16 oncology clinicians were recruited from our academic cancer center. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, our interviews systematically assessed multi-level factors shaping SIC implementation. In addition to interviews, patients completed a structured survey with validated measures on patient-focused communication and care planning. Survey data were studied descriptively, interviews were analyzed thematically, and both were integrated to triangulate qualitative and quantitative results. Results: Participants described two SIC types, which we classified as event-triggered and phased . Clinicians identified event-triggered SICs as prompted by acute incidents (e.g., disease stage transition) and more likely to lead to EHR documentation. However, they were seen as prohibitively time-consuming, and as such, did not become a top priority until a crisis arose. Patients were also uncomfortable with extensive early SICs, wanting to keep hope and avoid information overload soon after a diagnosis. They preferred not to discuss “turns for the worse” until they faced an acute challenge, at which point they valued thorough SICs. In surveys, almost all patients reported asking about benefits (96%), risks (93%), and quality of life (81%) tied to treatment, but few raised sensitive topics like planning for if things got worse (44%). By contrast, phased SICs were described as ongoing, progressive conversations not prompted by specific events and that arose early but deepened over time as a patient and care team nurtured their relationship. Patients and clinicians described phased SICs as better at promoting person-centered care and an essential foundation for SICs prompted by potential transitions. However, since these discussions occur gradually, clinicians reported challenges documenting them, reducing their value at informing future decisions and the ability to know whether conversations occurred at all. Conclusions: Interventions to increase SICs often focus on acute moments in the care trajectory. However, our study suggests that ongoing, staged approaches to SICs are vital for goal-concordant care as well and may be more easily integrated into busy clinical workflows. Further work should investigate ways to support clinicians in both SIC types, such as flexible documentation tools aligned with each approach.

Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture

Cross-cultural serious neurological illness communication: qualitative analysis of multidisciplinary perspectives

Transforming Communication on Serious Illness and Frailty: A Comprehensive Approach to Empowering Informed Decision-Making

Barriers and Strategies to Effective Serious Illness Communication for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease in the Intensive Care Setting

Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers toward the serious illness conversation guide: protocol for a qualitative meta-synthesis

Serious Illness Communication Training for Surgical Critical Care Fellows: A Pilot Implementation Study

Core Competencies for Serious Illness Conversations: An Integrative Systematic Review

An Online Training Program to Improve Clinicians' Skills in Communicating About Serious Illness

Enhancing Oncologists' Comfort with Serious Illness Conversations: The Impact of Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) Training

Interdisciplinary Approach and Patient/Family Partners to Improve Serious Illness Conversations in Outpatient Oncology

Improving Family Communication in Critical Care

Serious Illness Communication Tool for Palliative Care Fellows: Development, Implementation, and Lessons Learned

Patient and clinician perspectives on the timing of serious illness conversations in oncology.

Barriers to serious illness conversations in patients with advanced cancer: A mixed methods study.

Timing and content of serious illness conversations for patients with advanced heart failure in a specialty-aligned palliative care service

Trajectories of Serious Illness Communication During Long-term Acute Care Hospital Admissions (GP151)

Intersectionality and Inclusive Serious Illness Communication in the Intensive Care Unit

Exploring Communication Needs and Challenges in the Intensive Care Unit: A Survey Study From Providers' and Patients' Perspectives

Content Analysis of Serious Illness Conversation Documentation: Structured vs. Free-Text Information

Philosophy leading the way: An interdisciplinary approach to study communication of severe diagnoses

Speaking Up: How Patient and Physician Voices Shaped a Trial to Improve Goals-of-Care Discussions