Common Misspellings and Their Impact on Health Sciences Literature Search Results

Jill A. Turner,Julia L. Eisenstein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2023.2214038
2023-07-19
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
Abstract:This study examines the frequency of misspellings in health sciences literature and explores how they affect citation retrieval in multiple databases. Searches for commonly misspelled medical words were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL Complete, APA PsycArticles (ProQuest), APA PsycInfo, and ProQuest Psychology databases. Citations that would be retrieved using a word's correct spelling were removed from the search results. Remaining results were citations that could only be retrieved if the word was misspelled in the search. Articles with clinical significance were targeted. The top five most commonly misspelled words were occurrence, ophthalmology, pruritus, sagittal, and resistance. Ophthalmology had the highest number of citations that contained at least one misspelling, with 57% of those citations "missing" when searched with the correct spelling of the word. The word with the highest percentage (82%) of missed citations was arrhythmia. The results of this study indicate that misspellings in scholarly literature are more prevalent than searchers might realize. The ability to retrieve citations is adversely affected by misspellings, which has the potential to affect patient care. Many opportunities exist in the editorial process to identify and correct misspellings before publication. This is less so once a journal is published. The implications for database searching and manuscript evaluation are discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?