Abstract:An approach is presented to employ two different types of converters in bridgeless configuration for supply side power factor (PF) enhancement of the system. The employment of two different converter gives us flexibility to use benefits of both the converters and thus eliminate the component and make system cheaper, lighter, and efficient. An approach is presented to employ two different types of converters in bridgeless configuration for supply side power factor enhancement of the system. The isolated single‐stage electric vehicle battery charger uses two different converters in a bridgeless configuration to extract the advantages of both converters for supply‐side power factor enhancement. For the negative and positive semi‐cycles of the supply voltage, the power factor‐enhanced asymmetrical alternating current–direct current converter utilises a fourth order single‐ended primary‐inductor converter and a second order buck‐boost converter, respectively. The use of single‐ended primary‐inductor converter and buck‐boost converter in bridgeless configuration reduces the net order of the system with respect to conventional bridgeless‐single‐ended primary‐inductor converter schemes. The buck‐boost converter also needs the supply‐side filter to eradicate the unwanted harmonics in the supply current which increases the order of the system. The usage of both converters presents many benefits like input inductance of the single‐ended primary‐inductor converter can be utilised as a filtering element with a capacitor for the buck‐boost converter. The anti‐parallel diode conduction operation of both switches facilitates the elimination of extra reverse feed diodes (generally used in bridgeless schemes). The single‐stage charger itself comes with the benefit of elimination of extra stages and thus the losses associated with it. The presented charger also witnesses the elimination of the rectifier due to usage of bridgeless configuration. The isolated single‐stage electric vehicle battery charger is also garnished with electrical isolation which adds to the safety standard of the system. To attain power factor enhancement, the asymmetrical alternating current–direct current converter functions in discontinuous current conduction mode in the present work. The elimination of extra‐stages (with respect to two stage charger), a filter, a rectifier, two extra reverse‐feeding diodes, one voltage sensor, one current sensor (with respect to continuous current conduction mode), and electrical isolation not only makes the system compact and safer but also makes the system cheaper. Elaborated mathematical modelling and stability analysis of the presented alternating current–direct current converter using a pole‐zero map and bode plot have been included in the article. The prototype and MATLAB/Simulink model of isolated single‐stage electric vehicle battery charger system with discontinuous current conduction mode control has been built and results of both prototype and MATLAB/Simulink are deployed to verify isolated single‐stage electric vehicle battery charger system's performance during dynamic and steady‐state conditions.

Efficiency and dynamic characteristics of improved dual‐stage power converter setup with advanced model predictive controller for electric vehicle battery charging

An Integrated Design of Power Converters for Electric Vehicles.

Implementation of an A-Source DC–DC Boost Combination Phase-Shifting Full-Bridge Converter for Electric Car Rapid Charging Applications

Integrated Optimization of Dual-Active-Bridge DC–DC Converter with ZVS for Battery Charging Applications

An Improved Control Scheme for Reducing Circulating Current and Reverse Power of Bidirectional Phase-Shifted Full-Bridge Converter

A bridgeless configured asymmetrical alternating current–direct current converter‐based isolated single‐stage electric vehicle battery charger with supply side power factor enhancement

Phase-Shift Full-Bridge (PSFB) Converter Integrated Double-Inductor Rectifier With Separated Resonant Circuits (SRCs) for 800-V High-Power Electric Vehicles

Predictive load‐feedforward control for DC‐link voltage suppression and dynamic improvement of battery charging and discharging converter

High Efficiency Dual-Active-Bridge Converter with Triple-Phase-Shift Control for Battery Charger of Electric Vehicles

An 1.5-Kw Dual-Stage Converter with Combined Control for V2G Application

Application of improved bridgeless power factor correction based on one-cycle control in electric vehicle charging system

Performance evaluation of improved Y source power factor correction converter with enhanced power quality in EV rapid charger application

High Power Density Interleaved ZCS 80-kW Boost Converter for Automotive Applications

A Robust Controller for a Novel Single-Switch Non-Isolated Converter with Low-Order Ripples for Electric Vehicle Chargers

Design, analysis, and implementation of a phase‐shift controlled cascaded H‐bridge and anti‐interleaved zeta converter‐based E‐bike battery charging circuitry

Dynamic Improvement with a Feedforward Control Strategy of Bidirectional DC-DC Converter for Battery Charging and Discharging

Design of a 2.5-Kw 400/12-V High-Efficiency DC/DC Converter Using a Novel Synchronous Rectification Control for Electric Vehicles

A Novel Feedforward Scheme for Enhancing Dynamic Performance of Vector-Controlled Dual Active Bridge Converter with Dual Phase Shift Modulation for Fast Battery Charging Systems

Improving the Efficiency of an Isolated Bidirectional Dual Active Bridge DC–DC Converter Using Variable Frequency

A high-efficiency poly-input boost DC-DC converter for energy storage and electric vehicle applications

A CASCADED MULTILEVEL CONVERTER BASED ON SOC CLOSED LOOP TRACKING