Abstract:Cancer disparities are complex problems which require a deep understanding and strong collaboration from a broad set of perspectives across the academic and non-academic spectrum (community members, community-based organizations, policymakers) to identify sustainable solutions. The Community and Cancer Science Network (CCSN) initiative of the Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center is a transdisciplinary network focused on addressing statewide cancer disparities. CCSN grounds its approach in the principles of deep equity, systems-change, and the integration of biology to policy. CCSN currently includes multiple projects and more than 140 community and academic partners. Diverse transdisciplinary collaborations do not occur organically, often need facilitation and benefit from on-going assessment and support. To continually evaluate ways in which we can build and sustain strong teams and solutions, we utilize a developmental evaluation process leveraging the expertise of an external evaluation firm. Developmental evaluation supports social innovations by working with program leaders to focuses on learning and adaption. As CCSN has grown, developmental evaluation has allowed us to continually adapt how we build and guide our transdisciplinary teams. External developmental evaluators work with each project team as a cooperative partner and help guide the team leaders through understanding data needs, data collection, data analysis, and data interpretation. Our developmental evaluation began with journey mapping to understand the process and elements for successful leadership of a transdisciplinary team. This approach provided data allowing us to understand a pattern of certain pain points in collaborations and ways in which to prepare for and mitigate expected challenges. As the network has grown, we have utilized developmental evaluation to refine an annual partner survey and employ intermediate surveys (i.e., Right Now surveys) to assess team progress and openness to collaboration. Network mapping and stakeholder analysis have contributed to team formation helping team leaders consider new voices and perspectives. Further tools including Before/After Action reviews, Situational Analyses, and a readiness assessment were used to shape our understanding of successful transdisciplinary teams. We will show evidence of how these tools have positively impacted our ability to engage community and academic partners in authentic transdisciplinary collaborations over a four-year, and multi-project effort. Transdisciplinary Collaboration involving community and academic partners offer great promise for innovative approaches to cancer disparities. These unique collaborations may need additional support and guidance. Developmental evaluation provides tools to allow leaders to adapt to the needs and changes within complex teams. Citation Format: Laura Pinsoneault, Tobi Cawthra, Alexis Krause, Kristen Gardner-Volle, Jenelle Elza, Kim Kinner, Melinda Stolley. Strengthening transdisciplinary teams through developmental evaluation: Learnings from a multi-year, multi-project initiative [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl) nr C014.

Building a successful transplant research center: Blueprints and barriers

Patient-centered research in pediatric transplant: Engaging families and recipients

Mitigating Risk Associated With the Transition From Pediatric to Adult Kidney Transplant Care: Strategies to Promote Success

Expanding the access to kidney transplantation: Strategies for kidney transplant programs

Creating a "culture of research" in a community hospital: Strategies and tools from the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program

Improving Patient\Population Health: Using 'Why' to Develop a Transformative Research Center

Transplantation: platform to study recurrence of disease

Pre-Transplantation Strategies for Infectious Disease Mitigation and Prevention

Evolution of heart transplant donor characteristics in the 21st century: A United States single center's experience

Multidisciplinary approach to optimizing long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: multifaceted needs, risk assessment strategies, and potential interventions

Improving Health Equity in Living Donor Kidney Transplant: Application of an Implementation Science Framework

Engineering Equity Into the Promise of Xenotransplantation

Abstract C014: Strengthening transdisciplinary teams through developmental evaluation: Learnings from a multi-year, multi-project initiative

Transplantation: current developments and future directions

Patient-Centered Research and Outcomes in Cancer and Kidney Transplantation

What's New in Transplant Immunology: Problems and Prospects

Quality assessment and performance improvement in transplantation: hype or hope?

Strategy to Achieve Biomarker-Driven Immunosuppression after Solid Organ Transplantation by an Academic-Industry Partnership Within the European BIO-DrIM Consortium

Going to the Source: Discussions With Early and Mid-Career Faculty From Groups Underrepresented in Biomedical Research to Develop and Enhance CFAR Services

Transplant nephropathology: Wherefrom, wherein, and whereto

Forging international collaboration and alliances to establish the largest transplant center in the north of Vietnam