Abstract:The single-stranded nature of RNAs synthesized in the cell gives them great scope to form different structures, but current methods to measure RNA structure in vivo are limited; now, a new methodology allows researchers to examine all four nucleotides in mouse embryonic stem cells. The single-stranded nature of cellular RNAs allows them flexibility to adopt different secondary structures that can affect their function. However, current methods of measuring RNA structure in vivo are limited. Two papers published in this week's issue of Nature present new techniques to address this gap. Howard Chang and colleagues have exploited a click methodology that enables the first global view of RNA secondary structures in living cells for all four bases. While some structures are stable and seem to be programmed by sequence, others are dynamic, reflecting the binding of proteins or modification of the bases. This method may allow RNA to be analysed in vivo from a structural genomics perspective. In the second study, Jernej Ule and colleagues have developed a method, hiCLIP, to specifically measure RNA structures bound by proteins. Various features are observed, such as a preference for intramolecular interactions and an under-representation of structures in coding regions. The results confirm that RNA structure is able to regulate gene expression. While the functional significance is not known, it is notable that SNPs are not present at the expected frequency in coding regions. Visualizing the physical basis for molecular behaviour inside living cells is a great challenge for biology. RNAs are central to biological regulation, and the ability of RNA to adopt specific structures intimately controls every step of the gene expression program1. However, our understanding of physiological RNA structures is limited; current in vivo RNA structure profiles include only two of the four nucleotides that make up RNA2,3. Here we present a novel biochemical approach, in vivo click selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation and profiling experiment (icSHAPE), which enables the first global view, to our knowledge, of RNA secondary structures in living cells for all four bases. icSHAPE of the mouse embryonic stem cell transcriptome versus purified RNA folded in vitro shows that the structural dynamics of RNA in the cellular environment distinguish different classes of RNAs and regulatory elements. Structural signatures at translational start sites and ribosome pause sites are conserved from in vitro conditions, suggesting that these RNA elements are programmed by sequence. In contrast, focal structural rearrangements in vivo reveal precise interfaces of RNA with RNA-binding proteins or RNA-modification sites that are consistent with atomic-resolution structural data. Such dynamic structural footprints enable accurate prediction of RNA–protein interactions and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification genome wide. These results open the door for structural genomics of RNA in living cells and reveal key physiological structures controlling gene expression.

Low RNA stability signifies increased post-transcriptional regulation of cell identity genes

Chromatin-interacting transposon RNAs linking to the core trans-inhibition circuitry for embryonic stem cell identity

Low RNA stability signifies strong expression regulatability of tumor suppressors

RNA m6A modification regulates cell fate transition between pluripotent stem cells and 2-cell-like cells

Characterizing RNA stability genome-wide through combined analysis of PRO-seq and RNA-seq data

RNA m 6 A regulates transcription via DNA demethylation and chromatin accessibility

Regulation of small RNA stability: methylation and beyond

Gene-specific RNA homeostasis revealed by perturbation of coactivator complexes

Dynamic Regulation of RNA Structure in Mammalian Cells

RNA M6a Modification: the Mediator Between Cellular Stresses and Biological Effects

Methyltransferases Modulate RNA Stability in Embryonic Stem Cells

Genome-wide analysis of human microRNA stability.

Integrative network analysis identifies cell-specific <i>trans</i> regulators of m<SUP>6</SUP>A

Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 36 guides m6A RNA modification co-transcriptionally

Genome-wide determination of RNA stability reveals hundreds of short-lived noncoding transcripts in mammals

The RNA m6A reader YTHDC1 silences retrotransposons and guards ES cell identity

Computational inference of mRNA stability from histone modification and transcriptome profiles.

Structural Imprints in Vivo Decode RNA Regulatory Mechanisms

The RNA m 6 A reader YTHDC1 silences retrotransposons and guards ES cell identity

Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 36 guides m 6 A RNA modification co-transcriptionally

DDX21 mediates co-transcriptional RNA m6A modification to promote transcription termination and genome stability