Abstract:Objective: To evaluate effects and safety of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) combined with transdermal estradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of endometriosis. Methods: From January 1st, 2007 to July 31st, 2007, 28 endometriosis patients underwent laparoscopic or transabdominal surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to Fudan University were randomly divided into group A and group B. 14 patients in group A received 3.6 mg goserelin once every 4 weeks, 12 weeks in all. 14 patients in group B received goserelin and added 1/2 piece of half-hydrate estradiol every week and 6 mg oral medroxyprogesterone acetate per day, 12 weeks in all. Serum estradiol (E2), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), bone gla protein levels, visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, bone mineral density of lumbar spine, vaginal exfoliate cell spurs and the form of Kupperman were compared in patients before and after treatment. Results: (1) After treatment, the level of FSH and E2 levels were (5.0 +/- 2.6) U/L and (29 +/- 17) pmol/L in group A and (3.0 +/- 1.5) U/L, and (87 +/- 53) pmol/L in group B, which were significantly lower than those before treatment [FSH (17.0 +/- 12.2) U/L, and E2 (184 +/- 194) pmol/L in group A and FSH: (15.3 +/- 13.6) U/L and E2: (281 +/- 242) pmol/L in group B, P < 0.01]. On the seventh day after three-month GnRH-a treatment, it was observed that the level of E2 was higher and FSH was lower in group B than the level of E2 and FSH of group A (P < 0.01). (2) After treatment, the basal vaginal exfoliate cell proportion in group A [(66.2 +/- 29.0)%] was significantly lower than that in group B [(11.8 +/- 28.0)%, P < 0.01]; while patients in group A owned a lower proportion of the middle [(29.1 +/- 23.1)%], superficial layers [(4.0 +/- 5.5)%] and esinophilic cells [(2.3 +/- 2.6)%] than patients group B [middle layer: (73.0 +/- 25.2)%; superficial layer: (15.2 +/- 10.9)%; esinophilic cells: (10.8 +/- 7.9)%; P < 0.01. (3) Before the treatment, patients'VAS scores of total, pelvic pain, dysmenorrheal and dyspareunia were 7.43 +/- 3.20, 2.35 +/- 1.82, 4.93 +/- 1.98 and 0.14 +/- 0.53 in group A and were 7.71 +/- 2.02, 2.57 +/- 1.60, 4.86 +/- 1.56 and 0.29 +/- 1.07 in group B; after treatment, the scores above were changed to 0. 14 +/- 0.36, 0.07 +/- 0.27, 0.07 +/- 0.27 and 0 in group A and 0.36 +/- 0.50, 0.29 +/- 0.47, 0.07 +/- 0.27 and 0 in group B, which were all significantly lower than those before treatment separately (P < 0.01). When menstruation recovered, the scores were 0.21 +/- 0.43, 0.07 +/- 0.27, 0.14 +/- 0.36, and 0 in group A and 0.50 +/- 0.65, 0.29 +/- 0.47, 0.21 +/- 0.43 and 0 in group B, which were also significantly lower than those before treatment (P < 0.01), however, no statistical difference was found between groups at any time spot (P > 0.05). (4) In group A, the bone density after treatment [(0.96 +/- 0.06) g/cm2] was lower than that before treatment [(0.99 +/- 0.06) g/cm2, P < 0.01)]. In group B, the index was (0.98 +/- 0.09) g/cm2, which was lower than that before treatment [(0.99 +/- 0.10) g/cm2, P = 0. 201]. No statistical difference was found between groups (P > 0.05). The bone loss rate were (-2.77 +/- 1.97)% in group A and (-0.93 +/- 2.86)% in group B (P = 0.058). Before treatment, the bone gla protein was (13 +/- 3) microg/L in group A and (13 +/- 6) microg/L in group B. After treatment, the bone gla protein levels was (17 +/- 6) microg/L in group A, which was higher than that before treatment (P < 0.01), the level was (16 +/- 6) microg/L in group B, which was higher than that before treatment, however showed no statistical difference (P = 0.053). No difference was found in bone gla protein before and after treatment between two groups (P > 0.05). (5) The form of Kupperman after treatment were 15 +/- 7 in group A and 11 +/- 6 in group B, which did not show significant difference (P > 0.05) . The incidence of flash and sweat were 93% (13/14)in group A, which was significantly higher than that 57% (8/14) in group B (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The add-back therapy that consists of an estradiol patch and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate is effective and safe treatment for endometriosis.

Multicenter, prospective, single-arm clinical study to investigate the efficacy and safety of Zoladex (Goserelin acetate) 10.8 mg prior to surgery in Chinese premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids

EFFICACY OF GOSERELIN FOR POST-OPERATIVE TREATMENT IN CHINESE PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ENDOMETRIOSIS: AN OBSERVATIONAL, MULTICENTRE, OPEN-LABEL, NON-INTERVENTIONAL STUDY

The Efficacy and Safety of Triptorelin-Therapy Following Conservative Surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis A Multicenter, Prospective, Non-Interventional Study in China

The efficacy and safety of up to 24 weeks of triptorelin therapy following conservative surgery in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE): a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study in China

Clinical efficacy and safety of trimonthly administration of goserelin acetate 10.8 mg in premenopausal Chinese females with symptomatic adenomyosis: a prospective cohort study

Efficacy and Safety of Degarelix in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Results from a Phase III Study in China

Efficacy and safety of LY01005 versus goserelin implant in Chinese patients with prostate cancer: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority trial

Goserelin acetate 10.8 mg plus iron versus iron monotherapy prior to surgery in premenopausal women with iron-deficiency anemia due to uterine leiomyomas: results from a Phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial

The efficacy of GnRH-a followed by SanJieZhenTong capsules in long-term management of endometriosis: Study protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded, double-dummy randomized clinical trial

Chinese Medicinal Plants for Advanced Endometriosis after Conservative Surgery: A Prospective, Multi-Center and Controlled Trial

[Effects and safety of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist combined with estradiol patch and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometriosis]

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of SHR7280, a Non-peptide GnRH Antagonist in Premenopausal Women with Endometriosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study.

Combined Effects of Goserelin and Tamoxifen on Estradiol Level, Breast Density, and Endometrial Thickness in Premenopausal and Perimenopausal Women with Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of goserelin 10.8-mg depot in Chinese patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer

Treatment of symptomatic uterine adenomyosis with linzagolix, an oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist: a pilot study

Comparative study of different dosages of goserelin in size reduction of myomatous uteri

Efficacy and uterine bleeding patterns in initiating goserelin therapy during different menstrual phases in patients with adenomyosis: a prospective cohort study

[Clinical efficacy and safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist combined with estrogen-dydrogesteronea in treatment of endometriosis]

Ovarian protection with goserelin during adjuvant chemotherapy for pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer (EBC)

Adjuvant goserelin and ovarian preservation in chemotherapy treated patients with early breast cancer: results from a randomized trial

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SHR7280, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in healthy premenopausal women