Abstract:While corporate governance continues to play an important role in economic development, corporate governance issues are more complex in transition economies than in the developed market economies. Consequently, policy makers in transition economies have been busy attempting to establish a sound corporate governance system in their countries. This study uses China as a laboratory to explore corporate governance issues, as China is not only the most populous economy in the world, it is also undergoing transition from a socialist to a market economy since 1978. The need for strengthening corporate governance in the country has become all the more pressing as rapid economic growth has transformed the economy since especially the 1990s. China experienced a watershed in corporate governance when the split-share structure reform was introduced. Hence, we analyse in this thesis the impact of this reform on board composition, firm performance, and firm risk over the period before and after the introduction of the reform. Firms are classified by ownership into central government, local government, state owned enterprise (SOE) and privately controlled firms based on ultimate controlling shareholders. The study deploys static and dynamic panel data estimation methods to examine the determinants of corporate board composition, relationships between corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance, and the relationships between corporate governance mechanisms and firm risk. The results show that Chinese corporate board composition is jointly determined by the scope of operation (resource dependent theory), monitoring (agency theory), bargaining (power theory), other governance mechanisms (stakeholder theory) and regulations (institution theory). The government was the most important player in constituting board composition before the split-share structure reform was introduced, but independent directors became more important than other governance mechanisms after that. Private firms and SOEs are more concerned about cost than other factors when adding independent directors. Also, corporate board exerts a positive influence on firm performance once the share of independent directors reached 30 percent. Although the supervisory board can make up for the inadequate number of independent directors, its role became insignificant after the reform. Central government controlled firms show outstanding accounting and market performance. While increasing corporate board size reduced firm risk, its independence increased firm risk. State ownership and ownership concentration increased firm risk after reforms. Overall, the findings confirm the applicability of corporate governance theories to China. Other transition economies can draw lessons from the institutional change that have played a significant role in the evolving Chinese corporate governance system. Government-controlled firms should be more market-oriented so as to reduce the unnecessary influence of political power on firms activities. It also sheds light on the partial privatization approach that may work for other transition economies.

Communist Ideological Imprinting and the Transformation of State‐owned Enterprises

Institutional Rebound: Why Reforming China's State-Owned Enterprises is So Difficult

Organizational imprinting and the welfare practice of Chinese state-owned enterprises

How Do Institutions Inspire Ambitions? Differentiating Institutional Effects on Entrepreneurial Growth Intentions: Evidence from China

Why Firms Perform Differently in Corporate Social Responsibility? Firm Ownership and the Persistence of Organizational Imprints

Control Modes and Outcomes of Transformed State-Owned Enterprises in China: An Empirical Test

Sleep Late? Pre-reform Institutional Embeddedness and Entrepreneurial Reinvestment of Private Firms in China’s Transition Economy

How to Explain Corporate Investment Heterogeneity in China's New Normal: Structural Models with State-Owned Property Rights

The Influence from the Past: Organizational Imprinting and Firms’ Compliance with Social Insurance Policies in China

Work Experience of Private Entrepreneurs in SOEs and Enterprise Innovation Investment: Evidence from China

Institutional gap and enterprise behavior: Evidence from China

Imprinting Home Institutional Influence: Chinese Firms’ Long-Term Performance in Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions

How Institutions Rebound: Untangling Difficult Reforms in China’s State-Owned Enterprises

Change Your Identity and Fit In: an Empirical Examination of Ownership Structure Change, Firm Performance and Local Knowledge Spillovers in China

Can State Owned Enterprises Restructure ? Theory and Evidence from China ( Preliminary , Comments welcome )

Reinventing the State-Owned Enterprise? Negotiating Change during Profound Environmental Upheaval

Mixed Ownership Reform of State-Owned Enterprises and R&D Investment

The Impact of Shareholding Reform on Chinese Enterprise, 1995-2001

The Political Economy of State Sector Restructuring in China: Cross-Provincial Evidence 2008–2017

Corporate Governance, Firm Performance and Chinese State Enterprise Reform / Zhang Cheng

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China