Measurement of psychological constructs in military populations and settings

Armando X. EstradaJanice H. LaurenceFritz Drasgowa Temple University,Philadelphia,Pennsylvaniab University of Illinois,Urbana-Champaign,Illinois
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2023.2295211
2024-01-10
Military Psychology
Abstract:Advances in military psychology, as in other areas of psychology, are dependent on the integration of theory and sound empirical research. However, no matter how sophisticated our research designs may be, or how large a sample we may be able to obtain, the quality and applicability of our findings may not inform, influence or impact matters of interest to specific sponsors, military leaders, and policy-makers or the broader field, if our findings rely on measures of limited quality. Given the central role that measurement plays in advancing knowledge within military psychology, it is regrettable that military psychology researchers often find themselves having to rely on measures that were not specifically designed for use with military populations or in military environments. We should not be forced to rely on measures that have limited psychometric evidence, or that have limited application to military personnel. Adding to the scope of these concerns is the fact that most peer-reviewed journals do not necessarily support the publication of studies that are specifically designed to evaluate the validity of existing measures of psychological constructs with military populations or to rigorously evaluate structural or psychometric properties of measures developed with civilian samples or populations. Not surprisingly, military psychology researchers often face a series of unsatisfactory choices and risks when opting to use or adapt existing measures; or when time and other practical constraints lead to us to develop seemingly relevant new measures without rigorously evaluating their structural or psychometric properties because of unique demands of conducting research within the military environment.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily focuses on the measurement of psychological constructs in military psychology. Specifically, it points out that many existing measurement tools are not specifically designed for military populations or environments, thus having limitations in terms of quality and applicability. The author emphasizes the importance of high-quality measurement tools for advancing research in military psychology and notes that most current peer-reviewed journals do not support studies specifically evaluating the effectiveness of existing psychological construct measurement tools. To address these issues, this special issue brings together a series of papers that: 1. Report on new psychological construct measurement tools developed based on military populations or environments; 2. Evaluate the applicability and effectiveness of existing measurement tools in different military populations, including those from different countries or cultural backgrounds; 3. Use innovative methods to collect, analyze, and evaluate psychological constructs applicable to military environments. Through these studies, the special issue aims to improve the quality and applicability of measurement tools in the field of military psychology, thereby better serving the needs of military leaders, policymakers, and relevant researchers.