[Clinical effect of XEN gel stent implantation or combined with phacoemusification and intraocular lens implantation on glaucoma]
B Zhang,X L Shen,X P Wang,D Gong,J H Guo,J T Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20231223-00304
2024-09-11
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of internal XEN gel stent implantation or combined with phacoemusification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the treatment of glaucoma. Methods: It was a retrospective case series study. Forty-five patients (28 males and 17 females; 52 eyes) who had different types of glaucoma treated at the Shenzhen Eye Hospital from December 2021 to June 2023 were included. XEN gel stent implantation (the XEN group) or XEN implantation combined with phacoemusification and IOL implantation (the combined group) were performed in these patients. The postoperative follow-up was 18 months. The observational indexes included the best corrected visual acuity (recorded as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), intraocular pressure (IOP), XEN implantation quadrant, number of IOP-lowering medications, corneal endothelial cell count, operation success rate and surgical complications. The one-way repeated measures of variance, LSD-t test, and rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. Results: There were 28 patients (33 eyes) in the XEN group and 17 patients (19 eyes) in the combined group. The postoperative best corrected visual acuity had no significant change in the XEN group, but improved significantly (0.21±0.30 at 6 months; P<0.05) in the combined group, compared with the preoperative value. The IOP of the two groups at 18 months after surgery [(12.2±3.1) and (11.9±3.9) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)] was significantly lower than that before surgery [(22.1±8.5) and (19.4±10.2) mmHg; P<0.05]. The average number of IOP-lowering medications in all patients was 3 (2, 3) before surgery and 0 (0, 0) at 18 months after surgery. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the XEN group, the corneal endothelial cell count was (2 387.37±478.22) cells/mm² preoperatively and (2 193.89±311.96) cells/mm² at 12 months. The decrease showed no statistical significance. The XEN gel stent was implanted in the supranasal quadrant in 8 eyes (15.4%), in the inferonasal quadrant in 36 eyes (69.2%), and in the infratemporal quadrant in 8 eyes (15.4%). The operation success rate [complete success rate, 86.5% (45/52); conditional success rate, 9.6% (5/52)] was 96.2% (50/52). The filtering bleb scarring occurred in 9.6% (5/52) of eyes. A small amount of hyphema, postoperative shallow anterior chamber, transient hypertension, and intraoperative drain breakage were found in 7.7% (4/52) of eyes, respectively. A small amount of subconjunctival bleeding was observed in 5.8%(3/52) of eyes. Re-implantation of an XEN gel stent was performed in 5.8% (3/52) of eyes. The intraoperative conjunctival tissue rupture, hypotony macular edema, and drain exposure were observed in 1.9% (1/52) of eyes, respectively. Conclusion: The XEN gel stent implantation or combined with phacoemusification and IOL implantation was effective and safe in treating different types of glaucoma, but its long-term clinical efficacy needs further follow-up observations in multi-center, larger-scale research.