The contemporaneous phase of GRB afterglows — application to GRB 221009A

Evgeny Derishev,Tsvi Piran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae609

IF: 4.8

2024-02-28

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract:Abstract The TeV observations of GRB 221009A provided us with a unique opportunity to analyze the contemporaneous phase in which both prompt and afterglow emissions are seen simultaneously. To describe this initial phase of Gamma-Ray Burst afterglows, we suggest a model for a blast wave with an intermittent energy supply. We treat the blast wave as a two-element structure. The central engine supplies energy to the inner part (shocked ejecta material) via the reverse shock. As the shocked ejecta material expands, its internal energy is transferred to the shocked external matter. We take into account the inertia of the shocked external material so that the pressure difference across this region determines the derivative of the blast wave’s Lorentz factor. Applied to GRB 221009A, the model yields a very good fit to the observations of the entire TeV lightcurve except for three regions where there are excesses in the data with respect to the model. Those are well correlated with the three largest episodes of the prompt activity and thus, we interpret them as the reverse shock emission. Our best-fit solution for GRB 221009A is an extremely narrow jet with an opening angle θj ≈ 0.07○(500/Γ0) propagating into a wind-like external medium. This extremely narrow angle is consistent with the huge isotropic equivalent energy of this burst, and its inverse jet break explains the very rapid rise of the afterglow. Such inverse jet break occurs in an accelerating blast wave when the relativistic beaming becomes narrower that the jet’s opening angle. Interestingly, photon-photon annihilation doesn’t play a decisive role in the best-fit model.

astronomy & astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the problem of the physical mechanism in the early stage of gamma - ray burst (GRB) afterglows, especially when the initial afterglow occurs simultaneously with the instantaneous emission. Specifically, the article proposes a new model based on the observational data of GRB 221009A, aiming to explain the following two main problems:

1. **Rapid Rise Phase**: In the early stage of the afterglow, the rise time scale ($t_{\text{rise}}$) of the light - curve is much smaller than the decay time scale ($t_{\text{decay}}$). This means that a model capable of explaining this rapid rise phenomenon is required.

2. **Light - Curve Shape**: The afterglow light - curve is very simple. Its maximum value is located between two main instantaneous emissions, and there is no obvious response to the second instantaneous emission. This indicates that the model needs to explain why it is more sensitive to energy input during the acceleration process and less sensitive during the deceleration process.

To address these issues, the author proposes a relativistic shock model with intermittent energy supply. This model takes into account the following key points:

- **Energy Transfer between Reverse Shock and Forward Shock**: The reverse shock transfers the energy from the central engine to the shocked ejecta, and these materials then transfer the energy to the shocked materials in the external medium.

- **Explicit Consideration of Inertial Effects**: By introducing the inertia of the shocked materials, the rate of change of the Lorentz factor of the shock is determined by the average pressure gradient acting on the swept - up mass.

- **Energy Injection and Radiation Loss**: The model takes into account the kinetic energy injection from the ejecta and the influence of radiation loss.

Through these improvements, this model can well fit the TeV light - curve of GRB 221009A and explain the observed features, such as rapid rise, smooth light - curve, and three local excess regions (associated with the three strongest instantaneous emission activities).

In addition, this model unexpectedly provides a reasonable explanation for the reverse - shock radiation component. Although this component is weak in the TeV range, it may be stronger in other bands.

In summary, this paper successfully solves the observational features in the early stage of the GRB 221009A afterglow by proposing a relativistic shock model with intermittent energy supply, and provides a new perspective for understanding the initial stage of other GRB afterglows.