Reduced Likelihood of Hospitalization with the JN.1 or HV.1 SARS-CoV-2 Variants Compared to the EG.5 Variant

Matthew E Levy,Vanessa Chilunda,Richard E Davis,Phillip R Heaton,Pamala A Pawloski,Jason D Goldman,Cynthia A Schandl,Lisa M McEwen,Elizabeth T Cirulli,Dana Wyman,Andrew Dei Rossi,Hang Dai,Magnus Isaksson,Nicole L Washington,Tracy Basler,Kevin Tsan,Jason Nguyen,Jimmy Ramirez,Efren Sandoval,William Lee,James Lu,Shishi Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae364
2024-07-20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Within a multi-state viral genomic surveillance program, we evaluated whether proportions of SARS-CoV-2 infections attributed to the JN.1 variant and to XBB-lineage variants (including HV.1 and EG.5) differed between inpatient and outpatient care settings during periods of cocirculation. Both JN.1 and HV.1 were less likely than EG.5 to account for infections among inpatients versus outpatients (aOR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.84; p=0.003] and aOR=0.35 [95% CI: 0.21-0.58; p<0.001], respectively). JN.1 and HV.1 variants may be associated with a lower risk of severe illness. The severity of COVID-19 may have attenuated as predominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages shifted from EG.5 to HV.1 to JN.1.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?