Biological Effect of Biodegradable Mulch Films on Maize and Their Degradation Properties
Hu Hongliang,Han Zhigang,Zhang Guoping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2015.05.010
2015-01-01
Abstract:Summary Over the past few decades , the use of traditional mulch film made of poly‐ethylene enhanced agriculture production worldwide , and meanwhile raised a range of agricultural and ecological concern associated with degradation of soil fertility due to residue accumulation . It has become an increasingly challenging issue for agricultural sustainability . As a consequence , biodegradable films are proposed as an effective solution to alleviate this issue . Among them , poly ( butyleneadipate‐co‐terephthalate) ( PBAT ) , a biodegradable aliphatic‐aromatic polyester , possesses similar mechanical properties to polyethylene and therefore is generally considered an ideal substitute for conventional films . This study aimed at making a comprehensive evaluation of several recently developed biodegradable films by comparing their biological effects and field degradation properties . Five biodegradable films with a main component of PBAT were applied to cover the beds of maize in an experimental field , and then the soil temperature , plant growth indices and yield components of maize were investigated . Meanwhile , the field degradation of both biodegradable and conventional films was assessed by a standard of degradation degree . The results showed that the biodegradable films , compared to bare plot , markedly raised soil temperatures at three observation depths ( 5 cm , 10 cm and 15 cm ) and this heat capturing effect was as pronounced as the conventional polyethylene film . The temperature boosting effect varied with soil depth and time , i .e . , the biggest diurnal fluctuation of temperature occurred at the depth of 5 cm in each treatment , while the least was at the depth of 15 cm . The growth of maize was significantly stimulated in all mulched plots , with the occurrence of seedling emergence and silking stage being 3 5 days and 10 13 days earlier than bare plots , respectively . A minor advantage of biodegradable film over conventional film was also observed . The highest chlorophyll content (indicated by SPAD) was found in the bare plot , followed by M2 , and M1 was the lowest , yet there were no significant differences among mulching treatments . By contrast , leaf area indices ( LAI) of the biodegradable films were significantly higher than non‐mulched plot , with the highest in M2 . At the jointing stage , the plant height under all mulched plots were greater than that under the bare plot . While at the maturity stage , plants in the bare plot had the highest height , and there were no significant differences among the five biodegradable films . The largest accumulation of nitrogen , phosphate and potassium in plants occurred in the bare plot , being significantly higher than in the mulched plots . The fresh yield , kernels per ear and 100‐kernel mass were significantly larger in all mulched plots than in the bare plot . The yield per plot of the biodegradable films was higher than that of the conventional film , yet no difference existed between the biodegradable films and the conventional film in terms of kernels per ear and 100‐kernel mass . Field observation revealed that the biodegradable films started losing integrity at approximately 20 days after application in the field . The earliest clear disappearance of film started at 90 days after application for M2 . While the relatively slow degradation was found in M1 and M5 , which were torn into separate subunits with roughly 10 cm cracks after 100 days of field exposure , reaching the 4th period of degradation . In sum , all the biodegradable films are capable of enhancing maize growth by improving soil temperature and even contribute a larger economic yield than the conventional film ; moreover , the biodegradable films maintain stability for approximately 20 days after application in the field and disappear after 90 100 days , demonstrating the applicable effectiveness for mulching as a substitute of the conventional film .