Autologous platelet concentrates in alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review with meta‐analyses
Sayed Ahmad Manoetjer Siawasch,Jize Yu,Ana B. Castro,Rutger Dhondt,Wim Teughels,Andy Temmerman,Marc Quirynen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12609
2024-10-02
Periodontology 2000
Abstract:In order to evaluate the therapeutic advantages of various autologous platelet concentrates (APC) as a single biomaterial during alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), a systematic review with meta‐analyses was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were released prior to 2024. The selected papers compared an APC with either unassisted healing (blood clot) or another biomaterial during ARP (third molars were not included). The outcome parameters included alveolar bone dimension alterations, soft tissue healing, and post‐op pain intensity. The search yielded 35 papers (33 studies), one applying platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), six using plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), and 28 using leukocyte‐ and platelet‐rich fibrin (L‐PRF). These studies showed a large heterogeneity (e.g., outcome parameters, timing, surgical approach, and inclusion criteria), which hindered drawing strong conclusions. In most studies, however, ARP with PRP, PRGF, and L‐PRF alone produced faster soft tissue healing, less post‐extraction pain, less alveolar ridge resorption, more socket bone fill, and a higher bone density when compared to unassisted (spontaneous) healing. The ultimate benefit appears to be significantly influenced by the surgical approach. Limited literature exists comparing APC with other biomaterials for ARP, resulting in inconclusive data. APC application for ARP is a promising strategy to improve soft and hard tissue healing and reduce post‐extraction pain.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine