Abstract:The article analyzes the recent troubled relationship between China and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), following the July missile tests and the October nuclear test. One would wonder if Pyongyang was countering a potential Sino-Russian-Japanese rapprochement in the making, given the fortuitous timing of the nuclear test. One could also wonder if Pyongyang was playing a “provocative role” against a relative Sino-South Korea “rapprochement,” as Pyongyang may fear being “nailed” by all this rapprochement, thus losing its own diplomatic hand eventually on the Korean Peninsula. A recap of the tumultuous history of Sino-Korean relations could offer some clues, as Pyongyang would have attempted to play traditional power politics, like in the past 320 years, whereas China would ensure not being “sucked” into conflicts and controversies over Korea, as history has shown. The entree of the United States into the Korean fray via the Portsmouth Treaty (September 1905) and the Taft-Katusra “Agreement” (July 1905) was significant, as Washington had then joined Beijing, Tokyo and Moscow in “balancing” Korean forces on the Peninsula, a fact that has not changed fundamentally till today. But there is also a fundamental shift operating, as Seoul further distances itself from Washington's hard-line policy and “shifts” toward a softer line espoused by Beijing vis-à-vis Pyongyang, clearly for commercial and affinity-related issues. Finally, Beijing could have been deemed to have scored a diplomatic triumph from its “initial disappointment” and Pyongyang's “hanran” (meaning brazen or flagrant) action, following its missile and nuclear tests; the DPRK will likely return to the Six-Party Talks in December, thus giving Beijing a decisive diplomatic triumph on the Korean peninsula.

The Disadvantage of Nuclear Superiority

Deterrence During Disarmament: Deep Nuclear Reductions and International Security

Rival Hierarchies and the Origins of Nuclear Technology Sharing

Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents & Accidents

Targeting Nuclear Programs in War and Peace: A Quantitative Empirical Analysis, 1941-2000

U.S. strategy of damage limitation vis-à-vis China: long-term programs and effects

Plus Ça Change? Prospects of a Nuclear Deterrence Multipolarity in Southern Asia

Us Extended Nuclear Deterrence In Europe And East Asia: A Comparative Analysis

Great Expectations: Washington, Beijing, and the North Korean Nuclear Crisis

Reducing nuclear dangers

China's Search for Assured Retaliation: The Evolution of Chinese Nuclear Strategy and Force Structure

Towards Instability: The Shifting Nuclear-Conventional Dynamics In the Taiwan Strait

The effects of mortality salience on perceived risk and trust in the managing bodies of nuclear power: The moderating effect of nuclear power support

Kettles of Hawks: Public Opinion on the Nuclear Taboo and Noncombatant Immunity in the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Israel

The North Korean Missile and Nuclear Crises: China's Historic and Strategic Stakes on the Korean Peninsula

Two Major Nuclear Emergencies: A Comparison of Chernobyl and Fukushima

China'S Nuclear Perspective: Deterrence Reduction, Nuclear Non-Proliferation, and Disarmament

South Korea’s missile forces and the emergence of triangular strategic (in)stability

Assessing the Effectiveness of Security Assurances on the DPRK's Nuclear Issue

Multiple Attributes Decision Making Method on Social Stability in Nuclear Accident Scenario.

Restructuring the US-South Korea alliance to deal with the second Korean nuclear crisis