Abstract:Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, Ahead of Print. The scarcity or lack of access to essential services at the local and neighbourhood levels in cities can result in significant spatial inequalities, as some areas and their residents can deal with disadvantages and a lower quality of daily life. In particular, the spatial distribution and the variety of amenities at the local scale represent an important feature of the liveliness of places. The local availability and access to essential services are particularly relevant for some demographic groups experiencing limited mobility or mobility poverty, such as older adults living in cities, and spatial disparities have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted severe difficulties in accessing essential services. This work explores the issue focussing on the following question: who can access what depending on where they live in cities? Using Machine Learning and Spatial Autocorrelation applied to different data sources for spatial information on the location of urban amenities and Internet access, this work aims to identify the most underserved places in terms of the variety of available amenities and access to quality broadband in three European capital cities. A comparison to urban areas where high percentages of older adults reside makes it possible to identify where residents can locally access several essential services (green spaces, health care, and local shopping) and where this need cannot be satisfied because of a lack in the amenity variety available at walking distance to their home. The combination of underserved areas with a high concentration of senior residents identifies left-behind areas in these cities, where interventions on inequalities are most needed. Results can inform policies aiming at favouring fair access to services at the local scale, possibly including slow and active mobility modes, and in general to develop comprehensive and sustainable planning strategies for cities, leaving no place and no person behind.

Animal welfare deserts: human and nonhuman animal inequities

Measuring Changes in Perceptions of Access to Pet Support Care in Underserved Communities

Positive Animal Welfare: Bridging the Gap or Raising Inequalities Worldwide?

“Their Pets Are Loved Members of Their Family”: Animal Ownership, Food Insecurity, and the Value of Having Pet Food Available in Food Banks

Urban dog densities reveal environmental inequities in Santiago, Chile

Access to veterinary care: evaluating working definitions, barriers, and implications for animal welfare

A Multilevel Intervention Framework for Supporting People Experiencing Homelessness with Pets

Positive Wild Animal Welfare

Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife

The State of Research on Human–Animal Relations: Implications for Human Health

Neighborhood ethnicity is related to mammal occupancy and activity across a desert metropolitan area

Physical and behavioural health of dogs belonging to homeless people

Community Veterinary Medicine Programs: Pet Owners' Perceptions and Experiences

Human Relationships with Domestic and Other Animals: One Health, One Welfare, One Biology

Companion animal welfare and possible implications on the human–pet relationship

Residents' Perceptions of Urban Greenspace in a Shrinking City: Ecosystem Services and Environmental Justice

Barriers to Care in Veterinary Services: Lessons Learned From Low-Income Pet Guardians' Experiences at Private Clinics and Hospitals During COVID-19

Uncovering Pet Ownership Benefits, Challenges, And Resources: A Survey Of Professionals Working With Older Adults

Who can access what? Uncovering urban inequality in access to service for senior citizens

Human–Animal Relationships and Social Work: Opportunities Beyond the Veterinary Environment

Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States