Associations between Enroller Demographics and Subject Enrollment into a Randomized Cancer Prevention Trial

Ivana-Re Baldie,Chanjun Syd Park,Nancy Wood,Beau Abar,David Adler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.06.023

IF: 1.473

2024-02-11

Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Disparities in cancer clinical trial participation have long threatened external validity of findings. Potential explanations for disparities include research staff bias, lack of access to enrolling studies, and lack of racial concordance between research staff and patients. We sought to investigate this issue by examining associations between patient and subject demographics, as well as the impact of concordant demographic characteristics on enrollment into a randomized trial on cervical cancer screening among Emergency Department (ED) patients. The use of the diverse patient population found in the ED largely mitigates the concern of access. Data comes from an NCI R01 study experimentally examining a text-message based intervention to improve cervical cancer screening among ED patients. The current project utilizes shift chart information compiled by Emergency Department Research Associates (EDRAs) during enrollment of women into the trial. EDRAs, at our institution, are undergraduate students (∼30 students at any given time) who work as part-time research staff on a wide range of ED-based research projects. These students receive dedicated training in enrolling a diverse sample and cultural competency/sensitivity in research. The large number of EDRAs provides sufficient gender, racial, and ethnic variability to examine associations between their demographic characters and those of potential subjects. Χ2 tests of independence were performed relating enrollment status with patient and EDRA demographics. A total of 4,419 patient-EDRA encounters were examined: 2,450 White patients (55%), 1,334 Black patients (30%); 74 Asian patients (2%). Black women were less likely to enroll in the trial than White or Asian women (42% vs. 50%/61%). Rates of enrollment into the study were found to be similar across EDRA gender (47% when EDRA was a woman; 48% when EDRA was a man), though there was mild variability in enrollment rate across EDRA race (44 - 50%). Concordance between patient and EDRA race not strongly tied to enrollment. Conducting research in diverse settings such as the ED mitigates access to diverse populations as a barrier. Recruitment of diverse researchers is important, but it is not the only factor in ensuring representativeness in clinical trials. In addition, cultural competency training works to fight against biases researchers may have when approaching and explaining research to patients, therefore making patients more open to conversations and potentially enrolling into clinical trials.

emergency medicine