Reliability and Validity of Three Versions of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient‐Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study
Rina S. Fox,Linda Kwakkenbos,Marie‐Eve Carrier,Sarah D. Mills,Shadi Gholizadeh,Lisa R. Jewett,Scott C. Roesch,Erin L. Merz,Shervin Assassi,Daniel E. Furst,Karen Gottesman,Maureen D. Mayes,Brett D. Thombs,Vanessa L. Malcarne,Murray Baron,Susan J. Bartlett,Carolyn Ells,Marie Hudson,Yeona Jang,Annett Körner,Suzanne Kafaja,Frank Hoogen,Luc Mouthon,Warren R. Nielson,Robert Riggs,Karen Nielsen,Fredrick Wigley,Isabelle Boutron,Angela Costa Maia,Catarina Leite,Ghassan El‐Baalbaki,Cornelia Ende,Kim Fligelstone,Tracy Frech,Dominique Godard,Daphna Harel,Ann Impens,Sindhu R. Johnson,Ann Tyrell Kennedy,Nader Khalidi,Carlo Marra,Janet Pope,Alexandra Portales,David Luna,Anne A. Schouffoer,Brooke Levis,Maria E. Suarez‐Almazor,Joep Welling,Durhane Wong‐Rieger,Christian Agard,Alena Ikic,Perrine Smets,Sophie Roux,Benjamin Terrier,Adrian Hij,Sabine Berthier,Esther Rodriguez,Lorinda Chung,Anna Gill,Robyn Domsic,Pearce Wilcox,Paul R. Fortin,Robert Spiera,Brigitte Granel‐Rey,Claire Grange,Vincent Sobanski,Ariane L. Herrick,John Varga,Niall Jones,Joanne Manning,Thierry Martin,François Maurier,Sébastien Rivière,David Robinson,Doug Smith,Virginia Steen,Evelyn Sutton,Carter Thorne,Kimberly Turner,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23532
2018-10-26
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Fear of negative evaluation is a common concern among individuals with visible differences but has received limited attention in systemic sclerosis (SSc), which can involve substantial changes to appearance. The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE) was specifically designed to evaluate fear of negative evaluation. There are currently 3 versions of the BFNE with strong demonstrated measurement properties: two 8-item versions (BFNE-S, BFNE-8) and one 12-item version (BFNE-II). The present study evaluated these versions in SSc, and identified the most appropriate version for use among SSc patients.METHODS: Participants were 1,010 patients with SSc enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network cohort. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson's product-moment correlations were used to evaluate structural validity, internal consistency reliability, and convergent and divergent validity, respectively.RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that 1-factor models fit acceptably well for the 12-item BFNE-II, the 8-item BFNE-S, and the 8-item BFNE-8. Additionally, all Cronbach's alphas demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability (BFNE-II = 0.98, BFNE-S = 0.97, BFNE-8 = 0.96), and all versions had comparable associations with measures of social anxiety, body-related attitudes, depression, age, and education.CONCLUSION: Psychometric support was found for all 3 versions of the BFNE, although the longer 12-item BFNE-II did not improve measurement compared to the shorter 8-item versions (BFNE-S and BFNE-8). Of these 2, the BFNE-S has been more widely studied, with strong validity data in a greater number of populations. Therefore, the BFNE-S is recommended to assess fear of negative evaluation among patients with SSc.
rheumatology