TAX AUDIT PREVENTION: LEGAL CONSEQUENCES

В. П. Жмудінський,V. Zhmudinskyi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2023.1(57).280828

2023-05-31

Abstract:This article deals with the study into special aspects of legal consequences for taxpayers in case of preventing the controlling body officials from conducting a tax audit. It has been proven that the controlling body must have legal grounds for conducting an unscheduled taxpayer audit, which grounds are listed in the Tax Code of Ukraine. It is well-reasoned that if the tax authority has no legal grounds for conducting an audit or issuing an order to conduct an audit in violation of the requirements, the taxpayer shall have the right to prevent the controlling body officials from conducting a desk audit. At the same time, in addition to being prevented from conducting a tax audit, such a taxpayer has to file a claim with the court to cancel the audit order. At the same time, it was established that preventing the auditors from audit would result in appropriate response measures taken by the tax authority, such as administrative seizure of property and/or applying to the administrative court with a claim for seizure of funds on the accounts of such a taxpayer. It is noted that in the event of applying the administrative seizure of property, the controlling body has to file a statement with the court confirming the validity of the above administrative seizure; however, taking into account the fact that the business entity appealed the audit order, the courts mostly make decisions in favour of taxpayers for reason that there is a legal dispute between the controlling body and the taxpayer. The issue of law excludes the possibility of a court ruling on seizure of funds on the accounts of such a taxpayer. It is substantiated that the administrative seizure of property and the seizure of funds in accounts are ways of ensuring the fulfilment of tax obligations.