Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years of age.
Samantha L Huey,Nina Acharya,Ashley Silver,Risha Sheni,Elaine A Yu,Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas,Saurabh Mehta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012875.pub2
IF: 8.4
2020-12-13
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract:Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone that is important for its role in calcium homeostasis to maintain skeletal health. Linear growth faltering and stunting remain pervasive indicators of poor nutrition status among infants and children under five years of age around the world, and low vitamin D status has been linked to poor growth. However, existing evidence on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among infants and children under five years of age has not been systematically reviewed. To assess effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among infants and children under five years of age. In December 2019, we searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, 14 other electronic databases, and two trials registries. We also searched the reference lists of relevant publications for any relevant trials, and we contacted key organisations and authors to obtain information on relevant ongoing and unpublished trials. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi‐RCTs assessing the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation, with or without other micronutrients, compared to no intervention, placebo, a lower dose of vitamin D, or the same micronutrients alone (and not vitamin D) in infants and children under five years of age who lived in any country. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Out of 75 studies (187 reports; 12,122 participants) included in the qualitative analysis, 64 studies (169 reports; 10,854 participants) contributed data on our outcomes of interest for meta‐analysis. A majority of included studies were conducted in India, USA, and Canada. Two studies reported for‐profit funding, two were categorised as receiving mixed funding (non‐profit and for‐profit), five reported that they received no funding, 26 did not disclose funding sources, and the remaining studies were funded by non‐profit funding. Certainty of evidence varied between high and very low across outcomes (all measured at endpoint) for each comparison. Vitamin D supplementation versus placebo or no intervention (31 studies) Compared to placebo or no intervention, vitamin D supplementation (at doses 200 to 2000 IU daily; or up to 300,000 IU bolus at enrolment) may make little to no difference in linear growth (measured length/height in cm) among children under five years of age (mean difference (MD) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) ‐0.37 to 1.68; 3 studies, 240 participants; low‐certainty evidence); probably improves length/height‐for‐age z‐score (L/HAZ) (MD 0.11, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.22; 1 study, 1258 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence); and probably makes little to no difference in stunting (risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01; 1 study, 1247 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). In terms of adverse events, vitamin D supplementation results in little to no difference in developing hypercalciuria compared to placebo (RR 2.03, 95% CI 0.28 to 14.67; 2 studies, 68 participants; high‐certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether vitamin D supplementation impacts the development of hypercalcaemia as the certainty of evidence was very low (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.90; 2 studies, 367 participants). Vitamin D supplementation (higher dose) versus vitamin D (lower dose) (34 studies) Compared to a lower dose of vitamin D (100 to 1000 IU daily; or up to 300,000 IU bolus at enrolment), higher‐dose vitamin D supplementation (200 to 6000 IU daily; or up to 600,000 IU bolus at enrolment) may have little to no effect on linear growth, but we are uncertain about this result (MD 1.00, 95% CI ‐2.22 to 0.21; 5 studies, 283 participants), and it may make little to no difference in L/HAZ (MD 0.40, 95% CI ‐0.06 to 0.86; 2 studies, 105 participants; low‐certainty evidence). No studies evaluated stunting. As regards adverse events, higher‐dose vitamin D supplementation may make little to no difference in developing hypercalciuria (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.35; 6 studies, 554 participants; low‐certainty evidence) or in hypercalcaemia (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.18; 5 studies, 986 participants; low‐certainty evidence) compared to lower‐dose vitamin D supplementation. Vitamin D supplementation (higher dose) + micronutrient(s) versus vitamin D (lower dose) + micronutrient(s) (9 studies) Supplementation with a higher dose of vitamin D (400 to 2000 IU daily, or up to 300,000 IU bolus at enrolment) plus micronutrients, compared to a lower dose (200 to 2000 IU daily, or up to 90,000 IU bolus at enrolment) of vitamin D with the same micronutrients, probably makes little to no difference in linear growth (MD 0.60, 95% CI −3.33 to 4.53; 1 study, 25 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). No studies evaluated L/HAZ or stunting. In terms of adverse events, higher‐dose vitamin D supplementation with micronutrients, compared to lower‐dose vitamin D with th -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal