Cell-free DNA concentration as a biomarker of response and recurrence in HER2-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Mark Jesus M Magbanua,Ziad Ahmed,Rosalyn W Sayaman,Lamorna Brown Swigart,Gillian L Hirst,Christina Yau,Denise M Wolf,Wen Li,Amy L Delson,Jane Perlmutter,Paula Pohlmann,W Fraser Symmans,Douglas Yee,Nola M Hylton,Laura J Esserman,Angela M DeMichele,Hope S Rugo,Laura J van 't Veer,Mark Jesus M. Magbanua,Rosalyn W. Sayaman,Gillian L. Hirst,Denise M. Wolf,Amy L. Delson,W. Fraser. Symmans,Nola M. Hylton,Laura J. Esserman,Angela M. DeMichele,Hope S. Rugo,Laura J. van 't Veer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2928
IF: 13.801
2024-03-14
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Purpose: We previously demonstrated the clinical significance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Here, we compared its predictive and prognostic value with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration measured in the same samples from the same patients. Experimental Design: 145 hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative and 138 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with ctDNA data from a previous study were included in the analysis. Associations of serial cfDNA concentration with residual cancer burden (RCB) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) were examined. Results: In TNBC, we observed a modest negative correlation between cfDNA concentration 3 weeks after treatment initiation and RCB, but none of the other timepoints showed significant correlation. In contrast, ctDNA was significantly positively correlated with RCB at all timepoints (all R>0.3 and p<0.05). In the HR-positive/HER2-negative group, cfDNA concentration did not associate with response to NAC, but survival analysis showed that high cfDNA-shedders at pretreatment had a significantly worse DRFS than low shedders (hazard ratio 2.12, p=0.037). In TNBC, the difference in survival between high vs. low cfDNA-shedders at all timepoints was not statistically significant. In contrast, as previously reported, ctDNA at all timepoints was significantly correlated with DRFS in both subtypes. Conclusions: In TNBC, cfDNA concentrations during therapy were not strongly correlated with response or prognosis. In the HR-positive/HER2-negative group, pretreatment cfDNA concentration was prognostic for DRFS. Overall, the predictive and prognostic value of cfDNA concentration was more limited than that of ctDNA.
oncology