Abstract:Along with the large middle-income countries Brazil, China, and South Africa, India has been put under increasing pressure to shoulder parts of the mitigation burden and commit to national emission reduction targets. India, however, refers to its limited capacity and widespread poverty. Is India hiding behind its poor? While others examine the distribution of emissions within the country to answer this question, we study domestic policy making for energy subsidies and access to clean energy. Empirical evidence suggests that domestic policy making is at least partially consistent with the pro-poor arguments advanced at the international level. Given their large number and the country's democratic system, the poor do have some weight in Indian politics. However, pro-poor policies end where they do not translate into greater vote shares. Moreover, India's international position ignores the existing complementarities between climate-friendly and pro-poor activities. Policy relevance Despite India's recent growth spurt, its concern to fight energy poverty at home before engaging in any commitments on climate policy at the international level should be taken seriously within the international negotiations. Policy making in India is driven by democratic incentives, which, in this case, work to the benefit of the poor. Pro-poor policies may not go as far as one would wish from a developmental perspective, but the impact of the masses of the poor on domestic policy making is politically significant and cannot be ignored. This also provides some broader lessons for mitigation and adaptation policies in developing countries: politicians respond to incentives and support will only reach the needy if the appropriate incentives are in place. While we observe some significant commitment and implementation problems even in a democratic country like India, such problems must be expected to be even more serious elsewhere. This should not be overlooked when designing institutions for the allocation of climate finance, such as the Green Climate Fund.

Climate Action from Abroad: Assessing Mass Support for Cross-Border Climate Compensation

Domestic Provision of Global Public Goods: How Other Countries’ Behavior Affects Public Support for Climate Policy

Unilateral or Reciprocal Climate Policy? Experimental Evidence from China

Transfers in climate action teams

The Cost of Climate Action: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Climate Information on Charitable Donations to Climate Activism

Differentiated Responsibilities and Prosocial Behavior in Climate Change Mitigation: Behavioral Evidence from the United States and China

Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action

Willingness to incur private costs for climate adaptation? Public support for undergrounding electricity transmission lines in California

What Determines International Climate Finance? Payment Capability, Self-Interests and Political Commitment

Public perceptions and support of climate intervention technologies across the Global North and Global South

International Support for Domestic Climate Policies: Policy Summary

Can US multi-state climate mitigation agreements work? A perspective from embedded emission flows

Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*

The Comparative Politics of Transnational Climate Governance

International Climate Justice: What the People Think

Positive, global, and health or environment framing bolsters public support for climate policies

Global climate policy and local energy politics: is India hiding behind the poor?

Experimental evidence on the role of framing, difficulty and domain-similarity in shaping behavioral spillovers

The differential impact of climate interventions along the political divide in 60 countries

A Study of American Response to Climate Change and the Influence of Carbon Dependency, Social Capital, and Political Orientation

Cross-border CO 2 transport decreases public acceptance of carbon capture and storage