Evaluation of microsatellite instability status, a definitive predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), in underrepresented minorities (URM) with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

Fiyinfolu Balogun,Mirella Altoe,Catherine O'Connor,Nobel Chowdhury,Andrea Cercek,Choong-kun Lee,Michael Bonner Foote,Daehee Kim,Steven Brad Maron,Dae Won Kim,Karyn Ronski,Joon Oh Park,Calvin Y. Chao,Yelena Y. Janjigian,Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa,Luis A. Diaz,Eileen Mary O'Reilly,Francisco Sanchez-Vega,Debyani Chakravarty,Wungki Park
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.3538
IF: 45.3
2023-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:3538 Background: Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) results in MSI-H state and is the first tumor type-agnostic biomarker predictive of ICI response. Among GI cancers, MSI-H is most frequent in colorectal cancer (CRC 15%), gastroesophageal (GEC, 5%) and other (small bowel, hepatopancreatobiliary; 1%). For CRC, MSI-H can be attributed to germline mutation (Lynch syndrome, 3%) or somatic inactivation (sporadic, 12%) of foundational MMR genes. Studies evaluating ICI efficacy in dMMR cancers focus primarily on non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (pts). We present prevalence, tumor genomic features, and outcomes in pts from a large cohort at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK). Methods: Retrospective analysis of MSI-H GI cancers from MSK-IMPACT database. Pts were grouped by self-reported race and ethnicity into 4 study arms: NHW, Asian, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic. Age, tumor type, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and MMR genes were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) estimated with Kaplan-Meier. Results: Of 776 pts with MSI-H GI cancers: 623 (80.3 %) NHW, 60 (7.7 %) Hispanic, 50 Asian (6.5 %), and 43 (5.5 %) NHB. CRC (76%), GEC (14%), other cancers (10%). We present initial evaluation of CRC and GEC: Median age, TMB, and most frequently altered MMR genes (MMR gene FA) are in table. Median OS (mOS) in NHW/URM by receipt of ICI in MSI-H CRC were 38.5m/25.3m (p 0.07) in no-ICI group, 34.2m/28.7m (p 0.64) in +ICI group; MSI-H GEC 43.4m/30m (p 0.44) in no-ICI group, 28.8m/26.7m in +ICI group. Conclusions: Number of URM MSI-H CRC/GEC pts is 7 to 15-fold less than NHW, with no such difference in % MSI-H/MSS between groups; reflecting significant undertesting in URM pts. In MSI-H CRC, median age (m-Age) at sequencing was younger in URM compared to NHW; pronounced in Asian and Hispanic patients, who were 10+ years younger than NHW. No such age difference seen in GEC. No difference in mOS detected between NHW and URM, however a non-significant trend towards worse mOS in URM was observed in the no-ICI group. Next steps include validation of clinico-genomics of MSI-H GI cancers in other large cohorts, including TEMPUS (N = 768) which is ongoing. [Table: see text]
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?