Patriotism of the regional youth in the sociological dimension (case of the Penza region)

Igor Kuznetsov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2023.11.2.2
2023-06-23
Abstract:The article presents the results of a study of the relationship between a number of socio-political dispositions of young people with variants of everyday patriotic ideas in terms of «civil» vs «protective» patriotism. For the empirical base of the study the authors used the data of a survey of young people aged 18-30 years, conducted in September 2020 in the Penza region (N=530). Based on the results of the study, it was found that the options for attitudes towards the country on the scale of «civil» vs «protective» patriotism, in connection with their characteristic socio-political dispositions, are systemic integrities that have both positive and negative characteristics, if we evaluate these variants in terms of their consolidation potential, that is so much in demand in the current situation. The civilian version of patriotism contains a serious resource for the development of the country in all areas, but it does not have any significant potential for nationwide consolidation. This variant of patriotism is extremely important and in demand during the period of sustainable development of society in favourable political and economic conditions, but is fraught with risks of fragmentation of the community into separate, explicitly or implicitly conflicting groups in critical situations. The protective version of patriotism is characterised by the vision of the Russian socio-cultural environment as a closed self-sufficient system. This does not provide a significant potential for the socio-economic and socio-cultural development of the country. The most serious drawback of the protective version of patriotism is the risk of its gradual degeneration into chauvinism. At the same time, the protective version of patriotism has a serious potential for the consolidation of almost all layers and groups of the Russian population. During periods of peaceful development of society in favourable external and internal conditions, this variant of patriotism is little in demand and even undesirable, but in critical situations, the protective variant of patriotism can become relevant and popular.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?