Precision prognostics for cardiovascular disease in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abrar Ahmad,Lee-Ling Lim,Mario Luca Morieri,Claudia Ha-Ting Tam,Feifei Cheng,Tinashe Chikowore,Monika Dudenhöffer-Pfeifer,Hugo Fitipaldi,Chuiguo Huang,Sarah Kanbour,Sudipa Sarkar,Robert Wilhelm Koivula,Ayesha A Motala,Sok Cin Tye,Gechang Yu,Yingchai Zhang,Michele Provenzano,Diana Sherifali,Russell J de Souza,Deirdre Kay Tobias,ADA/EASD PMDI,Maria F Gomez,Ronald C W Ma,Nestoras Mathioudakis,Deirdre K Tobias,Jordi Merino,Catherine Aiken,Jamie L Benham,Dhanasekaran Bodhini,Amy L Clark,Kevin Colclough,Rosa Corcoy,Sara J Cromer,Daisy Duan,Jamie L Felton,Ellen C Francis,Pieter Gillard,Véronique Gingras,Romy Gaillard,Eram Haider,Alice Hughes,Jennifer M Ikle,Laura M Jacobsen,Anna R Kahkoska,Jarno L T Kettunen,Raymond J Kreienkamp,Jonna M E Männistö,Robert Massey,Niamh-Maire Mclennan,Rachel G Miller,Jasper Most,Rochelle N Naylor,Bige Ozkan,Kashyap Amratlal Patel,Scott J Pilla,Katsiaryna Prystupa,Sridharan Raghavan,Mary R Rooney,Martin Schön,Zhila Semnani-Azad,Magdalena Sevilla-Gonzalez,Pernille Svalastoga,Wubet Worku Takele,Anne Cathrine B Thuesen,Mustafa Tosur,Amelia S Wallace,Caroline C Wang,Jessie J Wong,Jennifer M Yamamoto,Katherine Young,Chloé Amouyal,Mette K Andersen,Maxine P Bonham,Mingling Chen,Sian C Chivers,Christoffer Clemmensen,Dana Dabelea,Adem Y Dawed,Aaron J Deutsch,Laura T Dickens,Linda A DiMeglio,Carmella Evans-Molina,María Mercè Fernández-Balsells,Stephanie L Fitzpatrick,Stephen E Gitelman,Mark O Goodarzi,Jessica A Grieger,Marta Guasch-Ferré,Nahal Habibi,Torben Hansen,Arianna Harris-Kawano,Heba M Ismail,Benjamin Hoag,Randi K Johnson,Angus G Jones,Robert W Koivula,Aaron Leong,Gloria K W Leung,Ingrid M Libman,Kai Liu,S Alice Long,William L Lowe Jr,Robert W Morton,Suna Onengut-Gumuscu,James S Pankow,Maleesa Pathirana,Sofia Pazmino,Dianna Perez,John R Petrie,Camille E Powe,Alejandra Quinteros,Rashmi Jain,Debashree Ray,Mathias Ried-Larsen,Zeb Saeed,Vanessa Santhakumar,Gabriela S F Monaco,Denise M Scholtens,Elizabeth Selvin,Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu,Cate Speake,Maggie A Stanislawski,Nele Steenackers,Andrea K Steck,Norbert Stefan,Julie Støy,Rachael Taylor,Gebresilasea Gendisha Ukke,Marzhan Urazbayeva,Bart Van der Schueren,Camille Vatier,John M Wentworth,Wesley Hannah,Sara L White,Shao J Zhou,Jacques Beltrand,Michel Polak,Ingvild Aukrust,Elisa de Franco,Sarah E Flanagan,Kristin A Maloney,Andrew McGovern,Janne Molnes,Mariam Nakabuye,Pål Rasmus Njølstad,Hugo Pomares-Millan,Cécile Saint-Martin,Cuilin Zhang,Yeyi Zhu,Sungyoung Auh,Russell de Souza,Andrea J Fawcett,Chandra Gruber,Eskedar Getie Mekonnen,Emily Mixter,Robert H Eckel,John J Nolan,Louis H Philipson,Rebecca J Brown,Liana K Billings,Kristen Boyle,Tina Costacou,John M Dennis,Jose C Florez,Anna L Gloyn,Peter A Gottlieb,Siri Atma W Greeley,Kurt Griffin,Andrew T Hattersley,Irl B Hirsch,Marie-France Hivert,Korey K Hood,Jami L Josefson,Soo Heon Kwak,Lori M Laffel,Siew S Lim,Ruth J F Loos,Chantal Mathieu,James B Meigs,Shivani Misra,Viswanathan Mohan,Rinki Murphy,Richard Oram,Katharine R Owen,Susan E Ozanne,Ewan R Pearson,Wei Perng,Toni I Pollin,Rodica Pop-Busui,Richard E Pratley,Leanne M Redman,Maria J Redondo,Rebecca M Reynolds,Robert K Semple,Jennifer L Sherr,Emily K Sims,Arianne Sweeting,Tiinamaija Tuomi,Miriam S Udler,Kimberly K Vesco,Tina Vilsbøll,Robert Wagner,Stephen S Rich,Paul W Franks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00429-z
2024-01-22
Abstract:Background: Precision medicine has the potential to improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction in individuals with Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies to identify potentially novel prognostic factors that may improve CVD risk prediction in T2D. Out of 9380 studies identified, 416 studies met inclusion criteria. Outcomes were reported for 321 biomarker studies, 48 genetic marker studies, and 47 risk score/model studies. Results: Out of all evaluated biomarkers, only 13 showed improvement in prediction performance. Results of pooled meta-analyses, non-pooled analyses, and assessments of improvement in prediction performance and risk of bias, yielded the highest predictive utility for N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (high-evidence), troponin-T (TnT) (moderate-evidence), triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index (moderate-evidence), Genetic Risk Score for Coronary Heart Disease (GRS-CHD) (moderate-evidence); moderate predictive utility for coronary computed tomography angiography (low-evidence), single-photon emission computed tomography (low-evidence), pulse wave velocity (moderate-evidence); and low predictive utility for C-reactive protein (moderate-evidence), coronary artery calcium score (low-evidence), galectin-3 (low-evidence), troponin-I (low-evidence), carotid plaque (low-evidence), and growth differentiation factor-15 (low-evidence). Risk scores showed modest discrimination, with lower performance in populations different from the original development cohort. Conclusions: Despite high interest in this topic, very few studies conducted rigorous analyses to demonstrate incremental predictive utility beyond established CVD risk factors for T2D. The most promising markers identified were NT-proBNP, TnT, TyG and GRS-CHD, with the highest strength of evidence for NT-proBNP. Further research is needed to determine their clinical utility in risk stratification and management of CVD in T2D.