Abstract:We study network pruning which aims to remove redundant channels/kernels and hence speed up the inference of deep networks. Existing pruning methods either train from scratch with sparsity constraints or minimize the reconstruction error between the feature maps of the pre-trained models and the compressed ones. Both strategies suffer from some limitations: the former kind is computationally expensive and difficult to converge, while the latter kind optimizes the reconstruction error but ignores the discriminative power of channels. In this paper, we propose a simple-yet-effective method called discrimination-aware channel pruning (DCP) to choose the channels that actually contribute to the discriminative power. To this end, we first introduce additional discrimination-aware losses into the network to increase the discriminative power of the intermediate layers. Next, we select the most discriminative channels for each layer by considering the discrimination-aware loss and the reconstruction error, simultaneously. We then formulate channel pruning as a sparsity-inducing optimization problem with a convex objective and propose a greedy algorithm to solve the resultant problem. Note that a channel (3D tensor) often consists of a set of kernels (each with a 2D matrix). Besides the redundancy in channels, some kernels in a channel may also be redundant and fail to contribute to the discriminative power of the network, resulting in kernel level redundancy. To solve this issue, we propose a discrimination-aware kernel pruning (DKP) method to further compress deep networks by removing redundant kernels. To avoid manually determining the pruning rate for each layer, we propose two adaptive stopping conditions to automatically determine the number of selected channels/kernels. The proposed adaptive stopping conditions tend to yield more efficient models with better performance in practice. Extensive experiments on both image classification and face recognition demonstrate t-e effectiveness of our methods. For example, on ILSVRC-12, the resultant ResNet-50 model with 30 percent reduction of channels even outperforms the baseline model by 0.36 percent in terms of Top-1 accuracy. We also deploy the pruned models on a smartphone (equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor). The pruned MobileNetV1 and MobileNetV2 achieve 1.93× and 1.42× inference acceleration on the mobile device, respectively, with negligible performance degradation. The source code and the pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/SCUT-AILab/DCP.

Memory-Oriented Structural Pruning for Efficient Image Restoration

Deep Neural Network Acceleration with Sparse Prediction Layers

MCMC: Multi-Constrained Model Compression Via One-Stage Envelope Reinforcement Learning.

Loss Constrains Added Squeeze and Excitation Blocks for Pruning Deep Neural Networks

Regularization-Free Structural Pruning for GPU Inference Acceleration

Learning Slimming SSD Through Pruning and Knowledge Distillation

Attentive Fine-Grained Structured Sparsity for Image Restoration

ClassPruning: Speed Up Image Restoration Networks by Dynamic N:M Pruning

Learning Efficient Image Super-Resolution Networks via Structure-Regularized Pruning.

Iterative Soft Shrinkage Learning for Efficient Image Super-Resolution

Lightweight Image Super-Resolution Via Flexible Meta Pruning

A Pruning Method Based on the Dissimilarity of Angle among Channels and Filters

Discrimination-aware Network Pruning for Deep Model Compression

A Dynamic Pruning Method on Multiple Sparse Structures in Deep Neural Networks

Identifying and Pruning Redundant Structures for Deep Neural Networks

Where to Prune: Using LSTM to Guide Data-Dependent Soft Pruning

Pim-Prune: Fine-Grain Dcnn Pruning For Crossbar-Based Process-In-Memory Architecture

A Structured Pruning Algorithm for Model-based Deep Learning

Memory Augment is All You Need for Image Restoration

Dreaming to Prune Image Deraining Networks

Comb, Prune, Distill: Towards Unified Pruning for Vision Model Compression