Clinical Progress of Orthostatic Hypertension in Children
Duan Hongyu,Zhou Kaiyu,Hua Yimin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20132969
IF: 6.133
2014-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:In healthy subjects, changes in posture are accompanied by autoregulatory mechanisms that ensure the relatively small fluctuations of blood pressure (BP). Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is well-recognized as a risk factor for falls, syncope, and cardiovascular events.1 Although OH is commonly encountered, orthostatic hypertension (OHT), with a marked increase in BP upon standing, has not been frequently reported.2–4 In the clinic, it is generally both unexpected and counterintuitive. However, sometimes, OHT can be dramatic and persistent. Studies in recent years have shown that OHT is a new cardiovascular risk factor.3,5,6 However, till date, most studies only focused on adults and aged patients; there were very few reports in children. Therefore, appreciation of the true incidence of OHT, elucidation of the underlying pathophysiology, and understanding of the potentially effective treatment approaches, associated risks, and benefits, might be significant in children. Definition No consensus has been reached on the definition of OHT. Matsubayashi et al7 reported that an active standing test in the healthy-aged people and the OHT was defined as an increase of at least 20 mmHg in the systolic BP (SBP; mean increases after 1 and 2 minutes) from that in the lying position. Additionally, Kario et al3 performed a head-up tilt test (HUTT) for 15 minutes after 10 minutes of supine rest in elderly patients with hypertension, and the SBP increase of ≥20 mmHg was defined as OHT. Some other researchers suggested that an SBP increase by >10 mmHg or even >5 mmHg after standing was a criteria of OHT.5,8 In another study, OHT was defined as both BP <140/90 mmHg in the lying position and ≥140/90 mmHg after staying upright for one minute.9 In this criterion, the absolute value is used and the patient with hypertension in the supine position might not confirm the diagnosis of OHT. Nowadays, OHT is commonly defined as an increase of at least 20 mmHg of SBP and of at least 10 mmHg of diastolic BP (DBP) from the supine position to the upright position.10 This assessment uses the magnitude of BP increase that can confirm OHT no matter whether the patients match the criteria of hypertension in the basic BP or orthostatic BP. It was in 2012 when OHT in children was first reported10 that greatly facilitated the study and clinical progress in the field. For OHT in children, it was defined as an increase of at least 20 mmHg of SBP and at least 10 mmHg of DBP from the supine to the upright position in 3 minutes.10 Incidence The incidence of OHT varies from different diagnostic standards. Zeng et al11 chose 317 young students and OHT was defined as an increase of at least 10 mmHg of SBP or DBP in the upright position within 3 minutes from being 10 minutes in the supine position. The occurrence rate of OHT was 16.4% (SBP) and 20.5% (DBP) respectively. Matsubayashi et al7 used the active standing test in which OHT was defined as a BP increase of ≥20 mmHg (mean increase after 1 and 2 minutes) from the BP in the supine position (mean value of two measurements) and OH as a decrease of ≥20 mmHg. The results showed incidences of 8.7% and 6.0% respectively in the elderly living in a community. Fan et al12 also applied active standing tests in 4 711 middle aged and the elderly subjects (aged 40–75 years) with hypertension, and an SBP increase of ≥20 mmHg was the diagnostic criteria. In this study, 16.3% of the subjects exhibited OHT. Some researchers analyzed 1 800 patients with untreated hypertension and found that 181 of the cases presented with OHT (DBP ≤90 mmHg in the supine position and DBP >90 mmHg in the upright position). In addition, they also demonstrated three specific clinical features compared with normal people: (1) intensified postural tachycardia, (2) diuretics intolerance, and (3) bluishness of the legs after standing. In another study, Hirai et al9 reported that the OHT prevalence rate in long-term type I diabetic patients who were <40 years of age was 15.2%. After OHT in children was firstly described in 2012,10 Kang et al13 investigated 2 089 children aged 2–17 years with unexplained syncope, headache, and dizziness. All those children were referred to the HUTT. The results showed that the occurrence rate of OHT in HUTT among those children was 23.84%. Clinical features and diagnoses The onset of OHT in adults is asymptomatic, while it is always found in physical examination occasionally. Symptoms related to pressure fluctuation, such as dizziness, headache, nausea, or vomiting, are not obvious. However, the relationship between OHT and cardiovascular disease gradually arouse people's attention. Evidence suggested that patients with OHT were at an increased risk for developing hypertension.8 Moreover, the increased sympathetic activity, BP variability, and fluctuation in patients with OHT may generate the circular tension and longitudinal shear stress in the wall of the blood vessels. Those changes could result in the dysfunction of the vascular wall and endothelium, and eventually lead to vascular remodeling, which is associated with target organ damages (such as silent cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, carotid atherosclerosis, and left ventricular hypertrophy) and cardiovascular events (such as coronary artery disease).14 In addition, OHT in adults can coexist with a variety of other conditions, such as pheochromocytoma, diabetes, mast cell activation disorder, Parkinson disease, and Shy-Drager syndrome. Thus, the manifestations of OHT can be a clinical feature of a cluster of other diseases.15 On the contrary, OHT in children is symptomatic in most cases but nonspecific. It is important to note that children with OHT may manifest with a diverse set of signs and symptoms. However, there are still some significant clues, such as syncope attack, susceptibility to dizziness or vertigo on standing, nausea, palpitation or dyspnea after mild exercise, and difficulty in getting out of bed, that aid in diagnosing OHT in children.16 In a pioneer study on children with OHT, involving 50 boys and 46 girls, it was reported that the mean age of onset of the disease was (11.8±2.7) years;10 22.9% of the patients suffered from OHT for less than 1 month, 51.1% for 1 month to 1 year, and 26.0% for longer than a year. 70.8% of children with OHT had syncope attack and 46.9% manifested as dizziness and other features including nausea, vomiting, pallor, etc. These clinical manifestations usually developed after postural change (24.0%) and long-term standing (57.3%). OHT can also be induced by exercise, muggy environment, and emotional change. There was a significant increase of upright SBP and DBP compared with the baseline SBP and DBP in the supine position (P <0.01). Meanwhile, the maximum heart rate upon standing was prominently elevated in comparison with the baseline in lying position ((113±12) vs. (81 11) beats/min, P <0.01). 66.7% of the children developed OHT in puberty and boys over 12 years of age have a greater incidence, which is possibly related with the more rapid physical growth and relatively slower neurologic development in puberty that result in neurohumoral deregulation.10,13 Active standing test and HUTT can diagnose OHT if orthostatic intolerance is suspected, whereas other diseases (such as neurologic diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic disorders) can be excluded. OHT is commonly defined as an increase in SBP by ≥20 mmHg and an increase in DBP by ≥10 mmHg.3,10,17,18 Active standing test is simple to perform but not accurate. Because orthostatic BP changes are highly influenced by the circulating blood volume, it is optimal to perform the test more than once before the diagnosis is confirmed. HUTT is the gold standard for diagnosis of OHT, but is time-consuming, difficult to clinically operate, needs professionals, and is difficult to perform frequently in daily clinical practice. HUTT at 60–80 degrees angle was recommended.19 Natale et al20 reported that, compared with 80 degrees angle, HUTT at either 60 or 70 degrees angle with or without low-dose isoproterenol infusion could provide a higher specificity. Other studies also showed that children were more sensitive to orthostatic stress than adults, and a specificity >85% can be achieved by HUTT at 60 or 70 degrees angle.21 Because some underlying diseases (e.g., essential hypertension and diabetes mellitus) can impact BP and make the patients have more variable BP than healthy normotensive subjects, further examinations should be indicated if the patients have some other clinical clues of underlying conditions independent of the OHT itself. Exclusion of other disorders that can cause similar clinical symptoms of OHT is also necessary. These disorders include brain tumor, Addison disease, cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, hyperthyroidism, electrolyte disorders, etc.16 Therefore, careful history collection, physical examination, and laboratory tests must be executed. Medications such as antihypertensives or antidepressants should be inquired because they may influence the diagnosis. Children often have poor compliance and emotional control, and thereby could be affected more obviously by white-coat phenomenon. To overcome these problems, a measurement of home or 24 hours BP monitoring is recommended for increasing the sensitivity and specificity of out-of-clinic OHT.22 Evaluation of severity, which is categorized as mild, moderate, or severe according to the impairment of life quality in children, was also mentioned by some researches to help clinicians decide the therapeutic strategies.16 Treatment Currently, the treatments of OHT are challenging. The clinician should make a broad management plan to reach the therapeutic goals to lower the patient's standing BP without lowering the supine BP, and specifically to prolong the standing time, improve postural symptoms, and life quality. Meanwhile, treating comorbidities are also important. To achieve all these goals, drugs alone are never adequate. Non-pharmacological strategies such as mild physical training (i.e., walking and swimming), physical counter-maneuvers, dietary changes (i.e., restricted salt intake) are the first line therapies. Compression garments and stockings are also recommended because they can reduce venous pooling in the lower extremities and avoid excessive sympathetic activation. However, they are difficult to put on and uncomfortable to wear.23 Explanation, guidance, and education are essential, which improves the recognition of the disease and decreases anxiety and nervousness in the patients and their parents. Psychosocial intervention and psychotherapy were mentioned as well by some reports.16 As for the pharmacological treatment, there is no experience in pediatric patients, and all the data are from the adult and aged patients. The indication, dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of the medications are unknown in children. Because over-stimulation of á receptor is the pathogenesis of OHT, á1-adrenoceptor antagonist and central á2 agonist may be used to moderate or severe OHT combined with non-pharmacological treatment. Hoshide et al24 performed an assessment of the effectiveness of doxazosin in hypertension control and OHT using home BP monitoring. They found that the orthostatic BP and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio in the OHT group with doxazosin were markedly reduced compared with the control group (P <0.01), which indicated that doxazosin might control OHT and prevent target organ lesion. Clonidine hydrochloride as á2 agonist can reduce the level of norepinephrine and may contribute to the treatment of OHT which is highly sensitive to baroreflex.25 Some researches showed that the administration of diuretics in OHT patients might stimulate further elevation of BP because of different mechanisms of OHT from essential hypertension.26 Currently, there are no data to demonstrate whether OHT should be targeted and treated specifically or not, which therapy would be optimal, what the benefits and risks of treating OHT are, and what the therapeutic endpoints would be? In addition, the therapeutic experience in children is rare. Therefore, clinical study of OHT treatment in children is greatly encouraged. Conclusions OHT is a clinical phenomenon characterized by hyperactivity of the sympathetic nervous system and hypersensitivity of the baroreceptor to postural change, which is associated with target-organ damages and is considered to be a form of prehypertension in youth and normotensive adults. It is a new risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and can coexist with other diseases. Diagnostic criteria and evaluation method are not standardized at present and a consensus should be achieved. Pathogenesis and clinical significance also need further research. The therapeutic strategies are being explored and targeted therapies to decrease morbidity and mortality are lacking. The data of pediatric patients is particularly limited, and further studies in this field will have a greater significance in the occurrence, development, outcome, and prognosis of this kind of disease than those in the adult and the aged patients. Basic science and clinical inquiry are extremely needed. (Received March 11, 2014) Edited by Chen Limin and Chen Xin